Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前Fixed it for yacdn.masto.hostimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1537file-textcross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
arrow-up1537imageFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostUnruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前message-square83fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 年前Because that’s what you’re implying.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 年前Yes you are: “We” cannot stop human beings from gaining power over others so the question is moot.
minus-squarerah@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase: “We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
minus-squarerah@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前 No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前So you admit it’s personal rather than topical, cool.
Because that’s what you’re implying.
I’m neither saying nor implying that.
Yes you are:
I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase:
“We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation.
Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
Got it, you’re refusing to engage.
With you only.
So you admit it’s personal rather than topical, cool.