Hi all, I’m a Lemmy FOSS app contributor that’s made a couple of tools for people starting small instances including Lemmy Community Seeder (LCS) for building content on new server’s All Feeds and Lemmy Post Purger (LPP) for clearing old posts on smaller instances.

Today I’m releasing Lemmy Defederation Sync (LDS). When launching a new Lemmy instance, administrators may not understand the necessity of defederation with problem instances. Using LDS, you can sync your instance’s “blocked instance” list with that of another server(s) whose admins you trust.

  • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You forgot people who selfhost single user instances. So they would have to destroy the old instance and create and new one with a new domain, which is a lot of work and resources.

    Edit: Please also notice the problem here is not defederation itself, but shared lists of defederation. Because most likely the list is super long and nobody would check if all instances are legitimately blocked.

    • thalience@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the single user on such an instance is so obnoxious as to be defederated from multiple larger instances, making them spend time and money to come back is a good thing.

      • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If he actually is obnoxious, then yes. But what guaranties he is obnoxious? Or that he just statements were just misinterpreted. Happens a lot.

        • thalience@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you trust the judgment of the (admins of the) sites you are syncing with, this isn’t a problem. If you don’t trust that, don’t sync with them.

          For instance, if I wanted to run my own server, I would absolutely sync with lemmy.world’s block list. I agree with their stated defederation policy, and have seen no evidence of the admins disregarding it.

          Perhaps you are misunderstanding what this tool does?

          • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am making an analogy of current situation of mastodon landscape where similar a project is based on questionable sources. Currently beehaw is nice and is blocking Lemmy.world. This makes me believe beehaw then end up blocking Lemmy world.

    • khornechips@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      What could a single user instance possibly do to be defederated on a massive scale? And at that point, why not simply join another instance?

      • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        that’s exactly where shared blocklist are a problem, if for some reason or another someone’s instance get mistakingly defederated, which is far form unlikely in one the enormous instances that have to manage federation of hundreds of instances, then all of a sudden, that big instance everyone trust get their blocklist copied all over the verse and poor jane is blocked from everything and has no idea why

      • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Afaraf
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They could have done nothing, but because someone on a so called trusted source de-federated it because he did not like him, de-federation would accumulate.

        Actually beehaw is a nice instance and is blocking lemmy.world, which too is fantastic. Thus sharing beehaw’s de-federation list would cut out lemmy.world from a huge audience. In this particulare case, I wonder what lemmy.world did wrong to be worth de-federating from.

        So you see, sharing huge block lists would wrongfully cut out people. Since nobody would investigate the whole list because doing so would take weeks.

        Joining another instance is out of the question for many because they are firm belivers of self-hosting and decentralization. Two principles that are pillars of the the fediverse.

    • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      This tool isn’t a shared master list like ad blockers use, it’s me spinning up my own instance and deciding I want to match my blocklist to lemmy.world or lemmy.ml or whoever, specifically. And who I sync from is a decision I make about who I trust etc. I can unmake it and switch my sync to another instance the moment I hear about something I disagree with.

      • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You get a point. This changes a lot of things. I need to review again the project page. I first understood that this is a shared block list. If it is just a mirroring of a given instance, then it is not the same.

    • Gamey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This tool is kind of for those single user instances tho and while something like this could hurt Lemmy that’s only the case if it’s used wrong, I doubt big instances will start to share block lists because they have the resources to gather them manually!

      • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I will exagerate and ask you: are you discriminating between bigger and smaller instances? While smaller instances are definitely small, together they are big enough.

        • Gamey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tf? I just say that it’s probably mostly single user and small instances that will want something like that because they don’t have the moderation caipabilities and might trust the admins of a big instance, not sure what your sentence is supposed to mean tho so could you explain?