• JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not just empty his clip, but also fatally wounded the person he was transporting at the time. He thought that the guy in the backseat, having already been patted down twice, handcuffed and detained; had a gun.

      This was definitely a reasonable amount of anxiety for a state-sponsored bully to have /s

      • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        In the link it specifically states the person wasn’t harmed (somehow). Unless there was a new development in the story this is false. ACAB and all that but we can’t spread misinformation.

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Either I’m misremembering or one of the things I’ve seen on it was wrong then. I watched this video earlier this week and I thought I remembered seeing body cam footage of them actually going to check on the guy after the shooting and the dude was dead in the backseat

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            That would be a cut together clip. Disinformation. I’m sorry you were subjected to it but in the case of the loud acorn the person detained was amazingly not physically harmed.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Think I would rather be shot(chance being shot really) by a cop than let a demonstrated murderer continue picking targets based on whatever bullshit criteria they have in mind.

      I can maybe take a bullet or three(~200lbs of … dubious composition). Children, the elderly or other likely targets? Not so much.

      EDIT: Imagine prefering random people get shot in a mass shooting(and/or by cops) vs the random “I can take it” self-proclaimed dumbass you encountered on the internet. Congrats, seven random morons, you’ve drank the just-as-toxic-but-sopposedly-opposite-of-toxic-masculinity kool-aide.

        • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You might be surprised. Some people get shot 20 times and walk away without any irreparable damage. It’s all effectively random.

        • kofe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Two friends of mine had perpetrators walk up and empty their clips into them. The smaller friend didn’t make it, but the larger one did miraculously survive with 8 bullets in his torso. I’d be morbidly curious to see if there was research supporting that the extra mass made the difference

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, there’s statistically more area without a critical organ/blood vessel to be hit. Plus you have more blood, so you can lose more in total.

            I think the difference would be small, especially compared to other variables though.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          it depends on where you get hit, unless you get hit directly in a main artery, or dont get tended to quick enough, you’ll more than likely be fine given enough time.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sorry, why /s? Cops aren’t even particularly good(or safe) shots. I would be more worried about them hitting another bystander in their attempts to shoot me.

          I’m not saying I would enjoy being shot, but statistically, about two-thirds of gun-shot victims survive(source: the Brady campaign), and, mass of jello that I am, I am in pretty good health since my time wiring barges up over the last year.

          That said, this is assuming I happen to be armed and choose to put myself in harm’s way, which is another consideration where I would prefer to be harmed vs others. Odds are good it would be because I chose to do something objectively stupid, versus others whose only choices are to run, hide, or confront their attckers un-armed and otherwise un-prepared.

          • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            “I can maybe take a bullet or three” sounded like such over the top bravado I was hoping it was meant tongue in cheek.

            Don’t get me wrong though I was just commenting on that sentence. I am not meaning to undermine your point about police and their (lack of) aim.

            • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Opposite of Bravado. I see myself as disposable vs most people until shown different, and most people I know who say such things as I have here and mean them seem to feel the same way about themselves. A mistake I don’t live to learn from(or learn of) is less terrifying than a failure to do right by others.

              I’m not saying I definitely won’t just hide, cry, piss and shit myself, but I didn’t do any of that(until hours later) the last few times I had guns pointed at me, and no, I don’t mean by friends or due to personal shenanigans(unless you count signing on certain government forms). It has been over 15 years since the last time though.