What do you have, what do you recommend, and why?

Asking as I’ve got a lot of spare components lying around that I’m planning on turning into a NAS. If it doesn’t work out I’ll buy a pre-built enclosure and reuse the drives.

  • @aedyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    I think as a turn-key solution, the prebuilt enclosures are fine. I have a two-bay Synology that works well. If you’ve already got components though, DIY is probably going to give you a lot more granular control. I’m planning on building out a home server rack including a TrueNAS VM or something similar.

    • @travis@lemmy.blue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      +1 for running TrueNAS in a VM, I’ve got one running in Proxmox. Make sure to enable hardware passthrough so TrueNAS has direct access to your drives!

  • @JoeHill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    I replaced an old prebuilt Windows Home Server with a custom built server running unraid about…7 years ago. unraid has been rock solid for me. Great product. Very scalable for the home user.

    Highly recommend unraid and it’s well worth the one time license fee.

  • @fryman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Understand that this is a rabbit hole where you’ll hear a million opinions. If you’re just starting out, I’d recommend keeping it simple. It’s been a while since I looked at what’s new, but I’d look at truenas scale or unraid first.

    I personally use truenas core (based on freebsd) but truenas scale (based on debian) opens up more options like docker that might be useful in the future.

    I recommend sticking to hardware you already own until you run into something that you can’t do. Then you’ll have a better idea of what to look for and how everything works.

    • @Piatro@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Thanks, the flexibility and closed source (I assume) of turn key solutions puts me off them. I’ve already got a raspberry pi running a few containers and I work with docker and Linux in my day job so I know a decent amount. The form factor of the turnkey solutions is the big draw for me at the moment to them as I’ve just got a spare ATX mid size tower handy. Would ideally replace with smaller case but then I’d need a smaller motherboard and that’s just raising costs for starting out. Potential upgrade path anyway.

      • @fryman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I have a node 304 case with an itx board and I wish I’d have gone with something bigger with more expansion slots. Some sata ports died on me so I installed an hba card to give me more. That means I can’t add a 10g nic or a video card for hardware acceleration or…you get the idea. Ideally spend less money now and experiment, then in the future you’ll hopefully learn what suits your needs.

    • @shrugal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Same. Having all their custom software available and just one click away is amazing, and with Docker you can install everything else just like a regular server. It’s the best of both worlds imo.

  • @ramblechat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Adding my 2c - I think it depends on if you want something that just works out of the box, or if you want to tinker and play with a DIY solution. I have a Synology DS220+ that just works, is easy to manage, has loads of apps etc. I also have a Raspberry Pi with Openmediavault installed and 3 SSDs attached which required a bit of setup, is more complex to get things working, also has apps (plugins) but is more of a project.

  • gds
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I used the cpu/motherboard/ram/psu from a desktop I’d since upgraded, slapped it into a 4u rackmount case I got cheap on Ebay (it looks awful - I think it was previously used in a lab - but it’s solid af), bought a nice big cooler and some noctua fans so it’d run quiet, added an HBA card, 4x shucked 14tb drives and a coupla 1tb m.2s, slapped Unraid on it, and was up and running with an awesome nas for really not that much money. Totally worth it, that thing is awesome.

    I will admit it doesn’t look as swanky as a synology, but it was far cheaper, is a lot more capable of non-nas stuff, and every part is standard and upgradeable.

  • poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Definitely try re-using what you have already. Just keep in mind that a NAS usually runs 24/7 and old gaming PC parts are usually quite power hungry, so it might cost a lot in terms of electricity.

    • @Piatro@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yeah this is definitely a downside to using spare gear over purposeful purchases. I think it makes sense to use what I have and optimise later. I’ve got an old intel i5 and mobo I’m planning on using for the NAS. Need to find another use for my old Ryzen 5 2600X.

    • THIS_IS____nothing
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I was going to say this too. It’s fun to have a project to do and to recycle old parts but something custom built for being a NAS will most likely be less power hungry and be less effort to maintain.

  • YuzuDrink
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    I had considered running a DIY for years, and eventually just caved and bought a Synology 1522+ NAS. It lets me run my Plex server and Matrix server, and it just handles all the config and updates for me easily.

    The decision was that I wanted to backup my hobbies, not have backup BE my hobby.

    • YuzuDrink
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      To clarify, running Plex is easy; running Matrix is very NOT easy… But being a NAS was the easiest part, by far. Stick the drives in, turn on, follow the short manual that came with it to configure, and let it do its thing.

  • shatteredsteel
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Personally, I use a “scratch built” machine to act as a file server/media server. Someone was going to recycle it at the office, so I added some hard drives and put it in a larger case.

    It really comes down to two things in my mind: what can you afford and how deep do you want to follow the rabbit hole?

    If you want something quick and easy, sure go for the premade. Nothing wrong with that.

    If you want to use it as a learning tool, and add other services, then I think a home spun server is the way to go.

    Just my 2 cents.

  • lemmyng
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Depends on how you intend to maintain it. I started out with a Synology NAS. When that started to give out the ghost I built own so that I could have better control over the software and hardware. It’s now a NAS of Theseus - all the parts (even the OS) have been replaced over time, but it’s still the same “unit”.

    The hardest part was deciding on a case. I started with a small form factor as a preference. Nowadays I just pick what gives me good airflow and ease in replacing parts.

  • viniciuspc
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    I am in the same situation, my concern about going DIY is the lack of ECC ram, but I don’t know how much this is important.

    • Maximilious
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For a NAS it’s very important because ECC allows write-back to your disks from cache in the event of a power failure. Without this, your data is at risk of being lost or RAID corrupting if you don’t have battery backup and\or your battery backup fails during power outage.

      I’m looking at building my own truenas server since my rack is only 22" depth, but I want a 12 bay hotswap array. Very challenging to find an matx board AND chassis that can fit the bill.

      • viniciuspc
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yes, and it is difficult to find ECC going DIY. Because of this I am considering going with Synology

  • @ravnswood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    If you have the knowledge or want to learn about it, and you are willing to deal with these tasks (configuring the system and keep it updated), the DIY approach makes sense.

    I was on that situation some months ago, and I didn’t want to spend time in system maintenance, so I bought a NAS device.

  • @tolle_locke@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I can highly recommend an Asrock j5040 board. It is power efficient and enough for all Docker images I throw at it.

    The onlydownside is, that it only has 4 SATA ports and 1 pci x1 connector, makes expanding difficult.

    Currently running: Nextcloud, vaultwarden, jellyfin, photoprism, immich and a few other container

  • topnomi
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    I’ve been just using hard drives in my server computer running on my old gaming computer.

    I recently switched my core os from linuxmint to opensuse tumbleweed. Ultimately the core os doesn’t matter much, it’s mostly personal interface differences. All my apps run on docker using docker-compose. I use caddy as my reverse proxy and letsencrypt certs.

    I’ve heard VERY good things about synology. Their software has a unique raid mode and an easy platform to host apps and such. But they’re kinda expensive…

    • shatteredsteel
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I use Opensuse on my stuff too. I do bare metal though, because I’m old and this newfangled docker stuff frightens and confuses me.

      • topnomi
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        The docker compose file lets me define all the variables in one file and link the configs to a folder next to the compose file. It lets me reinstall my core os, copy the Dockers folder, and bring them back up. All self contained.