The Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, were a series of coordinated attacks carried out by the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) from the Gaza Strip in areas bordering Israel on October 7, 2023. The attacks marked the beginning of the war between Israel and the Gaza Strip that continues to this day.
Operation al-Aqsa Flood was a significant turning point in the Palestinian struggle, marking the most fundamental change in the philosophy of resistance since the First Intifada (1987). The Palestinians, who for many decades thought that they would end the occupation and establish an independent state thanks to the support of the Arab world, realized by the mid-1970s that the Arabs would not take the necessary steps in this regard.
The leadership of the Palestinian resistance realized that the only path to progress depended on their own will and initiative, and launched a massive uprising against Israel with the power of its people. The First Intifada, therefore, led to a significant paradigm shift in the Palestinian resistance. Rather than waiting for a move from the international community or the Arab world, the local struggle against the occupying Zionist regime, albeit with limited means, could enable Palestine to make gains toward independence.
This new strategy also allowed the Palestinian resistance to institutionalize and build a strong identity. Moreover, the establishment of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) at the beginning of the First Intifada signaled that not only a methodological but also an ideological transformation would take place in the Palestinian resistance. As a matter of fact, in the following years, Hamas’ conception of the political order, the methods it used, the discourse it produced, and its clear stance against the Israeli occupation resulted in this movement finding a response throughout Palestine and becoming one of the most powerful actors in Palestinian political life
Hamas’ determined strategy over the years and the combat experience of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades allowed for the launch of an operation against Israel from Gaza. The operation, which began on the morning of October 7, marked a paradigm shift in the aftermath of the First Intifada. The Gazan resistance elements, led by the Qassam Brigades, shifted from a defensive model of resistance against Israeli attacks to an offensive strategy of multi-pronged infiltration. In addition, establishing a “joint operation center” of 12 different resistance groups to fight against the occupation forces in a coordinated manner was also noteworthy in uniting all Palestinian groups against the common enemy
As the first hours of Operation al-Aqsa Flood sent shockwaves through the Israeli side, the first signs of psychological damage also surfaced. For years, the Israeli state has created a convincing myth about the effectiveness and competence of its intelligence units. The undermining of the general belief that any action posing a threat to Israel inside or outside Palestine would be detected in advance and necessary measures would be taken constituted the first leg of psychological damage that started on October 7.
In addition to the failure of the potent intelligence myth after the operation, another myth that collapsed was related to the Iron Dome air defense system. The Iron Dome, widely regarded as one of the most potent air defense systems in the world, failed to fully defend Israel from thousands of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades missiles. This meant that even points far from Gaza could now threatened by the resistance. The failure of the system it had built has caused more damage than ever to Israel’s state machinery and society. In addition, the neutralization of a large number of army officers and the capture of hundreds of prisoners in the first hours of the operation shows how Operation al-Aqsa Flood dismantled the Israeli security apparatus.
The operation Al-Aqsa Flood and its subsequent local, regional and global repercussions, restored the Palestinian cause to its pivotal position on the Arab, regional and international levels, placing it in a central position amongst the general public as a liberation struggle against colonialism and uprooting racism. This provides an exceptional historical opportunity to reestablish the Palestinian cause on the international level as liberation struggle, facing the most unjust racist colonial aims in modern and contemporary history. This significant issue places a heavy load on not only the liberation activists, but also all the vigorous social actors around the world, especially in the Arab region, who bear the responsibility to take action. Those people are obliged to pursue all possible means to support the Palestinian cause and keep pace with the global solidarity with this cause at various political, diplomatic, legal, media, cultural and intellectual levels.
-
Operation al-Aqsa Flood: A Rupture in the History of the Palestinian Resistance and Its Implications
-
Operation Al-Aqsa Flood and the Aftermath: Towards a Global Action for Liberation of Palestine
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread
- 👊 Share your gains and goals with your comrades in the New Weekly Improvement thread
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
Could someone give me advice on civility baiting? All my college classes have a.clause which says to respect everyone’s opinion which ends up letting people defend genocide talk freely
Constantly say true things such as “israel deserved 10/7” and “hamas did nothing wrong”
“Hamas has a right to defend Gaza”
“Palestine has a right to take back its occupied territory by force”
“Settling civilians in occupied territories is a war crime”
Nah, rules like that are always one way.
I’ve found labelling their positions as eminent dangers or threats is a good way to remain civil and set them off.
Or just, like, point at them as say “this bigot is an active threat to minority groups on campus and tolerating their presence is in and of itself dangerous.”
Respect is an emotion, showing respect is an action. You can show respect without respecting. This bothers me semantically because you can’t have a clause making it mandatory you feel a feeling. Showing respect for someone’s opinion is also distinct from tolerating their speech. It also spirals into uselessness, if all opinions must be shown the same respect then these genocidal freaks need to accept and listen to your opinion that they are no better than the nazis.
Sometimes the best way to show respect for someone is to take their position at face value, acknowledge that this planet ain’t big enough for the both of you, and show that you fully accept and believe in their sincerity by
showing them how seriously you take them as a threat.
Pepper spray. Or the fire extinguisher if you have one handy.
Carry around the un genocide convention and read the entire thing out louad every time someone defends inhuman violence. If they object start over again from the top in a new language.
Or just, you know, stand up with a bullhorn and denounce the professor because allong genocide to go unchallenged in their class room in the name of some bullshit intellecutal curiosity is tactic support for genocidal ideologies and as the authoritarian ruler of the classroom they are solely responsible for allowing the proliferation of these beliefs.
Also, remember your sartre;
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
Genocidal bigots are almost never acting in good faith. If you don’t need the class stand up, point, and mock them. Fash often struggle to cope with open mockery. Unload your best chapo or even cumtown bit on them if the professor objects start recording and take it to the school paper. Idk about now but back in the day student news kids loved muckraking and the schools hated any controversy. It’s your education: make it everyone’s proble.