Shattered Pixel Dungeon- v2.5.2, desktop linux version from github

I am playing v2.5.2 on desktop instead of v2.5.3. This is mainly because I do not like the removal of the stone of disarming (and also because I do not like bombs, which seem too high-tech for medieval fantasy IMO). So it is possible that this issue was fixed on the desktop version of 2.5.3, if it is an issue. However, since I am on v2.5.2, I have not checked whether or not the behavior is the same on v2.5.3.

The journal cuts off floor 1 at the bottom of the screen. See the attached picture. Is this intended or unintended?

Thank you for your help.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    2 months ago

    I assume it’s empty like 10, 13, and 15, and not technically cut off? But I’m totally guessing there - I don’t actually know what this is supposed to show.

  • Vencedor@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    2 months ago

    Bombs have been in the game since who knows when. Also gunpowder was discovered in China, 2500 BCE, I think.

      • Vencedor@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        1st: that’s still medieval times 2nd: I said GUNPOWDER, not bombs. Bombs are made of gunpowder. Therefore, medieval bombs are possible. 3rd: Bombs are in other versions, so, I still don’t know what that has to do with not updating. 4th: my violent? What does that even mean?

        • leftascenter@jlai.luEnglish
          1·
          2 months ago

          Chill dude.

          Violent: autocorrect from comment.

          1. My point.
          2. Get a life and stop being a jerk.
          3. Gunpowder is from the 9th century
          • Vencedor@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2·
            2 months ago

            What point are you talking abt? When was I a jerk? As I alr said, 9th century are medieval times. Just because I disagreed with you (while you were actually wrong) doesn’t mean that I’m a jerk lmao. I didn’t call you dumb. Nor did I ever question your education. Why are you questioning me? Btw, that’s an ad hominem fallacy, which disproves your point entirely.