• Alk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree that it’s a good reason to pirate, but the meme/phrase is ostensibly trying to use the definition of owning to change the definition of stealing.

    It doesn’t prove anything, it just gives a good reason why people are pirating, when it looks like it’s trying to prove some logical relationship of the concepts.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      if my property can be taken without fair compensation so can theirs.

      pretty cut and dry logical relationship.

      • Alk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think we’re talking about two different things here.

        I agree that they have shitty predatory business practices. However, you did not sign an EULA saying that you could take their property. So even if they do take the things you bought from them away, you would be out of luck. The thing that needs to change is not allowing that to be classified as “buying”.

        What I’m talking about is “if buying isn’t owning” having anything to do with “then piracy isn’t stealing”. Buying not being owning is a great reason to pirate. Still doesn’t make piracy any more legal.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I mean, digital piracy isn’t stealing regardless of the premise that buying ≠ owning.

          Stealing is taking another’s property without the intent to return it. Making a digital copy is not taking any property, it’s creating a reproduction of it. The only place left to argue that piracy is stealing would be to say that you’re stealing the company’s theoretical revenue… but that revenue was never tangible property, being that it’s your money up until the moment you give it to them. Piracy is, and only is, copyright infringement.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why are you entitled to any video game you want for free?

            I’d argue stealing is also taking something for free that you would normally have to pay for.

            Aren’t you essentially arguing all digital property is worthless because its made of nothing?

            You know thats not true though, there is worth or else you wouldnt want to steal it.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Why are you entitled to any video game you want for free?

              Nobody here has claimed that, don’t put words in their mouths.

              I’d argue stealing is also taking something for free that you would normally have to pay for.

              Thats cool. You’re wrong, though.

              Aren’t you essentially arguing all digital property is worthless because its made of nothing?

              Nope, they’re pointing out that it’s infinitely reproducible and thus making a copy doesn’t deprive someone of their copy.

                  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I’m saying stealing and piracy are equivalent. Different words for the same thing. It does make sense pirates don’t want to be associated with the thieves, but as someone who has been around both groups, they are exactly the same thing.

                    Its the same as me going on farms and stealing fruit from their trees and calling it fruit sharing instead of theft. You can call it whatever you want, its still stealing when it comes to morals.

        • metaStatic@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I see where you’re coming from now and totally agree.

          Whenever a concept is distilled to a catch phrase it always loses something.

          • Alk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah that’s true. I have no creative bone in my body so I can’t even offer an alternative to the catch phrase I am calling out, unfortunately haha