• @KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    I don’t know how to feel about these sort of actions. On one hand, they’re funny, and it’s certainly making it hard for anyone to say the actions of the moderators aren’t democratically decided upon. On the other hand, it’s still driving engagement with the sub / site, and I rather doubt u/spez cares that people are only posting specific memes, or specific pictures, just that they’re posting something and creating engagement numbers he can point to and say “See? We’re open for business.”

    • @Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Bad look for the IPO when it’s immediately obvious that a significant percentage of the users hate the management and are trying to kill the platform

    • @decentralized@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I think that a lot of this recent push to monetize has surrounded the content on the site being used for AI models and big data with the intent to IPO. If all you can offer to consumers training a large language model is sexy photos of John Oliver and Olde timey speak. Then it becomes a lot less appealing as training data. I do agree that this will increase engagement, but if the alternative is hostile takeover maybe this is good?

      • @KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        It’s certainly better than a hostile takeover, I agree with you there. I doubt a significant amount of that AI training data is coming from r/pics or r/memes, though.

    • @MenacingMightOP
      link
      11 year ago

      From my understanding option 2 restricts the subreddit in a sense continuing the protest in a democratic fashion. You can correct me if I’m wrong