Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Hugohase@startrek.website to Green Energy@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago

Sweden switches on largest battery energy storage system in the Nordics - Energy Storage

www.ess-news.com

external-link
message-square
15
fedilink
74
external-link

Sweden switches on largest battery energy storage system in the Nordics - Energy Storage

www.ess-news.com

Hugohase@startrek.website to Green Energy@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago
message-square
15
fedilink
Sweden's largest energy storage investment, totaling 211 MW, goes live, combining 14 sites.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Hugohase@startrek.websiteOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    This looks exactly like I always imagined battery storage should look like, at least in a first step. Mid-sized batteries strategically distributed in the grid for frequency regulation/grid balancing.

  • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hate mixing W with Wh.

    Is it 211 MWh battery storage with maximum power output (peak, average, etc.) of 211 MW?

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      It very much looks like it is 211MW lasting for 1h giving 211MWh.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It literally says in first paragraph “…in Sweden to deploy 211 MW / 211 MWh…”

      • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        = 1 h

        It’s not a strictly technical megazine. That’s why I have doubts.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ha, right. Seems that distinguishing between power and energy is really a hard task (for journalists).

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          = 1 h

          MW / MWh = 1 h-1, no?

          • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            yes 👀

    • Tobberone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      There is usually a 1:1 between MW:MWh at these capacities.

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sadly no info whatsoever on batteries.

    • AlsaValderaan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I found this on it; still need to read through it. Some sort of lithium battery technology, it seems.

      • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t know specifics on this battery farm, but almost all are essentially fleets of shipping containers filled with smaller batteries, rather than some super-cool-mega-battery, so it’s probably a safe assumption that this is a landmark project in scale, rather than in technology specifics.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Li-Ion seems to be the go-to solution. I hope new static energy storage projects will prefer other options (Na-Ion, flow batteries, …) since there’s a limited supply of Lithium and we need it for vehicles.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I was hoping for other less toxic and more nature friendly ones, too.

        • Tobberone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s the only chemistry possible to source unfortunately. I read about other chemistries, but they are hard to find.

Green Energy@slrpnk.net

energy@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !energy@slrpnk.net

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

  • Electric Vehicles
  • Offgrid living
  • Hydrogen@fedia.io
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 298 users / day
  • 1.19K users / week
  • 1.94K users / month
  • 3.48K users / 6 months
  • 35 local subscribers
  • 4.26K subscribers
  • 1.86K Posts
  • 7.22K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Steve@slrpnk.net
  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org