• dev_null@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    The incentive is to make a profit. It would just be enormous profit instead of an unimaginable one.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Plenty of companies concentrate their efforts in places that are the most profitable and ignore areas that are less profitable.

      Just look at how many companies are only available in the US and not available in Europe, Asia, even Canada. Sure, they might get around to the US eventually, but it would be lowest priority since it’s the least profitable territory.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Being a huge market is still a major factor. A company would still prefer to do business in a 300M population English speaking country with a 10% profit margin, than a 10M population country with a 30% profit margin. But you are correct, companies that don’t want to pay taxes would leave. I say good riddance.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Right now, a lot of companies start in the US because the US is the best place to start. 330 million people, one language, good profits, etc. But, a punishing tax might mean that the profit margin is much less than 10%. 10% is a huge profit margin for most businesses, so it might drop from say 5% to 1%. At that point, Europe looks a lot more promising as a place to start. 450 million people, for the most part it’s one regulatory zone, you do have to have things in multiple languages, so that’s a bit difficult.

          Then, after Europe there’s east Asia: Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan. Then slightly poorer countries like Indonesia and India. Maybe South America next.

          The US would be near the bottom of the list if it was the only country with a punishing tax rate.