• qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Okay, what about calling it current society? I don’t see current society being able to change this for a long long time

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      The main function of cops is to protect the bourgeois, white-supremacist, patriarchal, colonialist state. I would like to get rid of the latter, so the former needs to go.

      • prowe45@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        So if and when we make that happen, and we have a society free of that stuff, do we think everything will always be perfect and free of conflict and no one will break the (hopefully much improved) laws? That seems unlikely, so we’ll need some kind of way of keeping the order, right? Will it not be the responsibility of a specific job? Will there be people with that job but we won’t call them any of the names we currently have for that general job category?

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          You won’t be able to recognise the so-called “justice system” or “order” in that hypothetical society, so no: that job won’t exist anymore.

          Yes, harm can still be done and this future society should and will find ways to prevent and/or heal that harm. Neither of these things are the police’s job, so why should we call that hypothetical job like the old system of violence?

          Even if you think that those things are done by the police: do you still call a shoe designer/manufacturer a cobbler?