• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Both options are fundamentally unacceptable to me. There is no conceivable situation where I would vote for either.

    If you’re somehow compelling me to act against my will, then, I don’t know, I might pick one randomly, or I might pick the one you don’t like out of spite, or I might pick the one you do like out of the hope you’ll be merciful to me in the future, since in this universe you can apparently control my body against my will.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      There is no conceivable situation where I would vote for either.

      Since you refuse to engage, let’s rephrase:

      Which would be the better outcome, Trump winning, or Kamala winning?

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        Kamala winning, at least in the short term, but it does set a bad precedent if it means the democrats learn they can support genocide and get away with it.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            27 days ago

            I’m not a psychic, so it’s difficult to say, but I will answer Kamala since you are so insistent on unambiguous answers.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              So in the short and long term, based on our best assessments, we agree the better outcome of this election is for Kamala to win over Trump*.

              Do you also agree that there is an (effectively) 0% chance of a third-party candidate winning this election? That come election night, the winner will either be Kamala or Trump?