The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 20 days agoA step too farlemmy.worldimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1974
arrow-up1974imageA step too farlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 20 days agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-squarePogbom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·19 days agoAlso tomatoes are fruits so suck it Italy
minus-squareLavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoI’ll give them that one because they taste like they should be vegetables but science says otherwise.
minus-squareShapillon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 days agoOtoh the fruit/veggie dinstinction is from culinary tradition and has nothing to do with botanical sciences.
minus-squareBertuccio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 days agoI don’t particularly mind the culinary fruit/vegetable definition, but feel like sweet fruits/savory fruits/vegetables would have been clearer.
minus-squareShapillon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoDurian would’ve been a fruitable :p
minus-squareLavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoThat’s interesting. It’s like how peanuts are legumes and not nuts. But I feel like that makes sense because of the pods.
minus-squareShapillon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoYeah and they grow in the ground too. A distinction that I find more entertaining than the fruit/veggie one is the berry category. blueberry: not a berry blackberry: nuh-uh Strawberry: you’re an accessory fruit banana: yup, totally a berry watermelon: go for it That’s nuts
minus-squareLavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoWho makes these rules? They’re so unintuitive.
minus-squareShapillon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 days agoThese rules are made by botanists. A berry is a fleshy fruit without a pit produced by a single flower containing a single ovary. This definition is different from the colloquial culinary one which refers to anything small, growing on a small plant or bush and without a pit.
Also tomatoes are fruits so suck it Italy
I’ll give them that one because they taste like they should be vegetables but science says otherwise.
Otoh the fruit/veggie dinstinction is from culinary tradition and has nothing to do with botanical sciences.
I don’t particularly mind the culinary fruit/vegetable definition, but feel like sweet fruits/savory fruits/vegetables would have been clearer.
Durian would’ve been a fruitable :p
That’s interesting.
It’s like how peanuts are legumes and not nuts. But I feel like that makes sense because of the pods.
Yeah and they grow in the ground too.
A distinction that I find more entertaining than the fruit/veggie one is the berry category.
That’s nuts
Who makes these rules? They’re so unintuitive.
These rules are made by botanists.
A berry is a fleshy fruit without a pit produced by a single flower containing a single ovary.
This definition is different from the colloquial culinary one which refers to anything small, growing on a small plant or bush and without a pit.