Yesterday, an unexpected admin post was made announcing that hexbear would be shutting down and recreating two of their most popular communities (a): the_dunk_tank and dredge_tank. For those who are not aware, those two are some of the most notorious comms in the threadiverse which routinely cause inter-lemmy drama (disclaimer, the deteriorating relations between our instance and hexbear and my own ban from hexbear was ultimately triggered by various posts in the_dunk_tank)

The stated reason was to promote more thoughtful discussions and to prevent a white cishet mindset which was apparently promoted by the content in those comms, according to the mods and admins.

Within a day 1.3 thousand comments were made with hexbear regulars upset at this decision and discussing within.

However, before this announcement, the top admin of hexbear posted in the cross-lemmy admin matrix chat urging other admins to close down their “drama communities” as well.

Hexbears caught wind of this and quickly accused the admin of duplicity, and having other motives instead of their stated ones. The admin in question as defense admitted that it was their attempt to manipulate other lemmy instance admins and it backfired on them

After a whole day of this, the main admin decided to step away from hexbear (a) , followed by more resignations (a)

In the midst of this, people realize another old-mod had recently come back after a 3-year hiatus, and now people start suspecting some correlation. That mod makes a public post (a) before shortly after deleting their account.

There’s also smaller pieces of chaos ongoing, such as one admin, banning one of their alts “as a bit” using wording that they were not aware is misgendering (“fella”) which caused other hexbears to pile on. Eventually that was resolved, and admins are asked to tone down the “bit doing” during this heated period.

This “struggle session” is still ongoing, with people are asking the resigned mod to come back , and other admins unbanning accounts which were getting banned left and right(a) but it seems those popular comms still remain shut down.

EDIT: Even lemmygrad is wondering what the hell is going on

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 days ago

    Well to be fair, hexbears cannot downvote you anyway since they have them disabled instance-wide

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      That… is an excellent point actually.

      Wow, in that case I truly don’t know what’s going on. Sometimes I see downvotes for the same content on discuss.online, but there are no downvotes visible on PieFed.social. Perhaps there was a federation issue, or some other instance federated from one but not the other.

      Thanks for the reminder - I don’t want to spread misinformation:-).

      Edit: but separately from vote counts, the point about PieFed allowing users to block spam is still valid!:-)

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        If piefed doesn’t have an apub ingest queue, it’s very likely it’s just missed federation activities.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          New posts and comments continually show up so I thought it does (assuming the only other alternatives would be the API, which they said they don’t want to use, or web scraping, which similarly they wanted to avoid), but it does seem not entirely stable e.g. sometimes communities will get duplicated so there must be a backend bug in that process. So for a mere one or two downvotes to disappear especially at a time of higher-than-usual traffic leading up to and following the USA elections, it very well could be that.

          It would not be the first instance to have such occurrences - e.g. aussie.zone and programming.dev to name a couple - so I haven’t worried overmuch. But it’s definitely not a selling point for PieFed either, nor perhaps a detractor since Lemmy suffers identically. Or at least did prior to 0.19.6 that hopefully will solve a great deal of that, especially when deployed specifically onto lemmy.world.:-)

            • OpenStars@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              True, yet they were specifically waiting for this one, so it’s a different expectation this time:-).