• Wowbagger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I think you misunderstand what hurts an economy. It hurts an economy when a country stop importing from you, not when they stop exporting(at least to a much bigger degree) . And around 15% of Chinese exports goes to USA.

    • RaisedFistJoker [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      the real problem for america is if china stops exporting to them, it would hurt china a lot, but i reckon it would be country collapsing for america, so much of the american economy is built on cheap chinese inputs

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      What matters is relative damage to each economy and how easily the trade partner can be replaced with an alternative. When you include all the intermediate inputs it turns out China is the main source of these goods for about 95% of all American industrial sectors https://edconway.substack.com/p/globalisation-is-a-far-far-bigger

      The US is completely and utterly dependent on exports from China, meanwhile majority of China’s economy is insulated from the US. In case of a trade war, the damage to US would be much more significant than the other way around. Furthermore, as Russia showed, it’s possible to redirect trade away from the west. China is now actively learning from Russian experience.

      On the other hand, reshoring production is a much more difficult task than shifting exports to a different market. The US doesn’t have a coherent plan for achieving that, and it will take many years to implement even if there was one. It requires training out an educated workforce, building factories, securing supply chains, and so on. This is a decades long project.