ID: Drawing of a duck billed platypus underwater, they’re wearing a rainbow coloured t shirt and a pink bum-bag, and saying: “Ally is not something you can self-identify as, it’s a title that you earn. Let your actions speak for themselves!”

Credit: Sophie Labelle

  • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    So in your opinion indirect action may as well be inaction?

    Say I have coworkers with certain opinions on gendering people, use of pronouns or who still use dated terms like “Tranny” or “Shemale”.

    I spend my days correcting them when they misgender or reminding them of acceptable words to describe people. I have political discussions where we come to terms about how LGBT rights are human rights. They’ve corrected their behaviour and now speak of LGBT folks in a kinder light.

    I don’t directly see how those actions affect LGBT folks. I don’t have tangible evidence I have made a person’s life better through my actions.

    Am I an Ally or not?

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      No, indirect action is a form of action, stopping a transphobe from being transphobic is a form of allyship, because presumably, you’ve saved a trans person from feeling unsafe around that person.

      • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        20 days ago

        Because you stated that, on the presumption their actions prevented transphobia, that person would be an ally. But that presumption can only be fact checked by themselves anyway; Does this not mean then, that a person should have the right to label themselves an ally if they self-assess their actions as allyship?

        Or does someone have to ally-check each of their actions once performed with some sort of… council or committee, as I have here?

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          It’s not that deep, we don’t need a rigorous philosophically consistent way to measure allyship.

          • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            20 days ago

            That’s fair.

            But this post posits that we do need to get philosophical as does your initial post. By claiming there’s “theoretical allyship” we call into question the efficacy of small actions performed by allies and serve to weaken the cause.

            Any action is action. No matter how small.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 days ago

        Ok, so proclaiming yourself an ally doesn’t make you an ally, unless 1 person notices it?

        I feel that someone noticing it is a part of “proclaiming”, but I agree with you. I do think you worded it rather strictly and awkwardly. Telling yourself that you’re an ally is worthless, telling someone else has value.