• persolb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love it in theory… but it just broke so many websites I needed to use. And not always in obvious ways.

        • persolb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          UBlock is much more reliable than no script in my experience. It’s also usually obvious when it breaks; no script sometimes isn’t obvious until you hit submit and notice none of what you typed actually got sent.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Then just put those sites on your trust list?

        You can go through all the sites the initial HTTP request calls out to and decide which ones get a pass. This is how I ensure sites like gstatic, googletagmanager, etc. don’t collect data even though the rest of the site works.

        If that’s too much, just open the flood gates for that site and trust everything there. At least it isn’t just sending all your data out by DEFAULT.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          That still breaks a lot of sites. For example, Wikipedia gets broken if you click any link and then navigate back. NoScript is just crap. If you want to actually block scripts for something without breaking everything else, use DevTools.

          • Daniel@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can use Wikiless, an alternative frontend for Wikipedia which doesn’t have JavaScript, and LibRedirect.

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I call bs. I am not experiencing that on mobile or desktop this behavior you’re describing. NoScript does not break Wikipedia.

      • gammasfor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah these days literally every website uses JavaScript in some format as modern reactive design is easier to do if you can execute client side code. Blocking JavaScript is a sledgehammer solution to the problem.

      • OfficerBribe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same here. I used NoScript in the past and remembering whitelisting way too often so dumped it in the end. Now I just use uBlock with I think some built-in javascript block of known bad hosts.

    • vii@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can use Ublock Origin in advanced mode, which allows you to block, blacklist/whitelist scripts.

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      uBlock Origin can act as adblocker plus NoScript combined if you enable advanced mode.