Okay, now compare “Campaigned with the daughter of a war criminal” to “Is a war criminal rapist felon con man with dementia.” You’re arguing that “Not a good look” is worse than “Possibly the actual Anti-Christ.”
You shouldn’t assume that everyone who criticizes Kamala Harris’ actions during the campaign supported Trump or didn’t vote. That’d make you just as tribal and reactive as Trump supporters.
Okay, now compare “Campaigned with the daughter of a war criminal” to “Is a war criminal rapist felon con man with dementia.” You’re arguing that “Not a good look” is worse than “Possibly the actual Anti-Christ.”
You shouldn’t assume that everyone who criticizes Kamala Harris’ actions during the campaign supported Trump or didn’t vote. That’d make you just as tribal and reactive as Trump supporters.
Either you voted for Harris or you didn’t. This isn’t tribal or reactive, this is a basic understanding of how the election works.
What’s the third option you fool? Yes everyone who criticized Kamala either didn’t vote or supported trump…or they voted for Kamala. You’re an idiot.
Dude it’s possible to criticize a candidate and still vote for them.