• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If you want to make that point, I would ask that you back that claim up. There are a few important things you need to tackle in order to do so:

    1. The mass support for the Bolsheviks among the Working Class, and the Soviet system in general

    2. The mass expansion in democratic power under the Socialist system as opposed to the prior Tsarist system

    3. You need to prove the cause of the Bolsheviks being “power/control” and not a genuine adherance to the pursuit of Socialism

    All 3 of those are hard truths that we can see through commonly accessible historical texts and archival evidence. We can track metrics like the doubling of Life Expectancy, free healthcare and education, the highest literacy rates in the world, massively lowered wealth disparity, a huge emphasis on teaching Marxism to all workers, and more. What we find, is that while not perfect, the USSR was indeed a massive progressive movement for the working class not only in Russia, but the whole world over, from Cuba, to Algeria, to Palestine, to China, to Vietnam, Laos, Korea, and more. The presence of the USSR forced the New Deal into existence, among other western concessions, even those not aligned with the USSR benefited.

    If you have an opinion and feel confident enough to stand by it, I would hope you also have reasons and experiences that back that up. From what I have shown, and if you want me to link stats and sources I can, I think it’s fair to say that the Bolsheviks were genuine Marxists that upheld and carried through the revolution. Regardless of percieved arrogance of Marx and Lenin, their teachings and theory provided the theoretical backbone for every long-lasting leftist country, even the EZLN who most think of as more Anarchistic (they have their own ideology but much was inspired by Marxism-Leninism).

    I highly recommend listening to Michael Parenti’s 1986 “Yellow Parenti” lecture.