• 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    another great example is satisfactory. it was in early access for a long time and the result is amazing.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 年前

      It was on Epic Games before that too, but it is still incredibly rough around the edges, even after launch. From listening to the dev logs, it seems they made a lot systems quickly initially and then out grew them and spent a lot of time rewriting poor code, there was quite a bit of mismanagement with Satisfactory.

      • 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        idk, have you played it? I have well over 1000 hours in it and it was worth every cent I spent from the day I bought it. even if they never added any updates after update 6 I would’ve been satisfied. but they didn’t, they added so much more stuff and the 1.0 release was huge and really fucking awesome. I don’t care about the dev logs or what their code quality is, the game is and was great and that’s what I paid for.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          Yes, I have over 500 hours myself and I am playing it right now aha.

          I would recommend the game and it is worth the money. That doesn’t mean I am going to pretend it is perfect and without issues. I am constantly wrestling with things in game, crashing and running into bugs.

          I am also way more critical of games I like, because I want them to be just that bit better.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      The exact one I was thinking of

      Valheim is another great example, though it’s still probably a year out from release