• refalo@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    why change the title

    As I mentioned, I felt it was more transparent to say where the money comes from and let people draw their own conclusions. Of course there will always be dissenting opinions no matter which title is used, I think that just comes with the territory, and I’m ok with that; I don’t think there is a single right or wrong answer. I’m sorry that you disagree with my choice. I encourage you to make similar posts wherever you’d like with your own desired title.

    Thank you for your perspective.

    • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      it isn’t more accurate though, you are lying about where the funding came from. congress only approved the budget for the government, they didn’t have a say in who got the money that was being handed out. there is a single right answer and it is to not change the titles of news articles to suit your own opinions. if you want to present your opinion, you do it by making your own post. posting a news article is for sharing the article, not for lying about it’s contents to suit the story you want to tell.

    • Hominine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The only “territory” that deliberately manipulating a title comes with is that of misinformation. For what other reason would another application be wedged in? Why are other grants left out? It’s all very plain.

      • refalo@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think real intelligence by definition requires empathy and humility, which is typically the opposite of such dogmatism in my opinion.

        “As a rule, strong feelings about issues do not emerge from deep understanding.” -Sloman and Fernbach

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Strong feelings about issues do not emerge from deep understanding

          My feelings about capitalism are largely fueled by how well I understand it. When I understood it less, I didn’t mind it as much

          I don’t like this quote

        • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          intelligence has nothing to do with empathy or humility, it is a measure of knowledge and problem-solving. lying about the contents of posts and pretending you are justified is not intelligent, even if you add a quote.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      where the money comes from

      Well you failed because it comes from the taxpayer.

    • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      OTF receives the majority of its funding from the U.S. government via the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM). Funding is appropriated for OTF through the annual  Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs appropriations and provided to OTF via a grant agreement from USAGM.

      For FY 2023, Congress allocated $90.5 million for programs to promote Internet freedom globally, representing a $13 million increase from FY 2022. Of the funds allocated for Internet freedom, $40 million was designated for OTF. Per the appropriations, all Congressional funding provided to OTF is used to support “programs to promote Internet freedom globally.” In addition to helping to further OTF’s mission, this funding increase is also further recognition of the increasing need for the tools and technologies OTF supports.

      In addition to funding from USAGM, OTF also accepts funding from other mission-aligned donors for discrete Funds, Labs, or Fellowships. For example, OTF’s FOSS Sustainability Fund is supported in part by funding from Schmidt Futures’ Plaintext Group, Okta for Good, and the Github Foundation.