I hate people who treat them like some toys and fantasize about them. That makes me think they are in some sort of death cult. That they found socially acceptable way to love violence.

I would still get one for safety but it is a tool made for specifically one thing. To pierce the skin and rip through the inner organs of a person.

They can serve a good purpose but they are fundamentally grim tools of pain and suffering. They shouldn’t be celebrated and glorified in their own right, that is sick. They can be used to preserve something precious but at a price to pay.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The thing is, using the gun for killing is exactly the correct one. That’s the intended purpose. Then you may threat to use it correctly as a means of protection.

    But there are other ways. Gun rights are almost universally revoked throughout Europe, for example, and barely anyone fears for their close ones, because of a working police and professional army, as well as, exactly, less access to guns that could be used to perpetrate violence.

    As the result, banning guns normally leads to a decrease in the number of homicides and assaults.

    • zqps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Honestly the bigger factor is social cohesion and combating criminogenic factors. While far from perfect, European societies are doing much better here than a proudly hyper-individualist US.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Also true, but having wide access to guns is one of those factors, even though it’s not the whole story.

        • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Finland has very similar access to guns, yes it has much fewer total guns but that is much fewer people having many guns, they have a very similar percentage of homes with at least 1 firearm in them as the US currently does. It is actually a myth that they control the ammo, they control their military ammo, not their hunting/personal ammo. Switzerland is not THAT far behind though they I believe do have tighter restrictions on ownership. Also the percentage of households with at least 1 gun in it has remained mostly unchanged in the US for the last 60+ years, and the types of guns available have also remained largely unchanged, intermediate caliber semi automatic mag fed rifles have been shockingly cheaply available in the US since the M1 Carbine became available as military surplus after WW2. Something other than “availability of firearms” is very different now to explain the gun violence (it’s mostly culture and systemic poverty).

        • gens@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          We still have people atacking people with axes and knives. Thing is you can at least try to run away from an idiot with an axe, unlike an idiot with a gun.