WhiskeyOaks [none/use name]@hexbear.net to History@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 months agoI'm Curioushexbear.netimagemessage-square234fedilinkarrow-up177file-text
arrow-up177imageI'm Curioushexbear.netWhiskeyOaks [none/use name]@hexbear.net to History@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square234fedilinkfile-text
minus-square∞ 🏳️⚧️Edie [it/its, she/her, fae/faer, love/loves, ze/hir, des/pair, none/use name, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·9 months agoBut what if the extremes of reason are the start and the end, and the correct position is in the middle of that
minus-squareCowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·edit-29 months agoI mean, the correct stance need not be bound to abstract spatial relations of stances
minus-square∞ 🏳️⚧️Edie [it/its, she/her, fae/faer, love/loves, ze/hir, des/pair, none/use name, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-24 months agoWhat was I even thinking about… Oh right, reasoning is a process. You start somewhere, reason and reach a conclusion, so the middle of that is just stopping part way through the reasoning, never reaching a conclusion.
minus-squareCowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 months agoOh yea, makes sense!
But what if the extremes of reason are the start and the end, and the correct position is in the middle of that
I mean, the correct stance need not be bound to abstract spatial relations of stances
What was I even thinking about… Oh right, reasoning is a process. You start somewhere, reason and reach a conclusion, so the middle of that is just stopping part way through the reasoning, never reaching a conclusion.
Oh yea, makes sense!