• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I support linking the original site as a general rule, but I don’t think GamingOnLinux is blog spam.

    GamingOnLinux is the OMG!Ubuntu of Linux gaming, a website several link aggregators rightfully banned.

    He curates information from a variety of places, provides a quick accessible summary, and very clearly links back to the article he’s referencing.

    GOL does less summarizing of hard to read sources than Phoronix and even Phoronix is questionable lots of times.

    If GOL does some original reporting: Fine. If GOL summarizes discussions from bug trackers and mailing lists: Fine.

    If GOL just rewords content that right there in the original source: Blog spam.

    In this specific case, his table of specs is far more readable and accessible than the obnoxious advertising product page is.

    I see no problem with https://starlabs.systems/pages/starlite-specification which is accessible from the hard to miss drop down menu at the top.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cleaning up the key points of an original source (especially a dumpster fire product ad page like that specifically designed to obscure relevant details behind nonsense formatting) isn’t spam.

    • sik0fewl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see no problem with starlabs.systems/pages/starlite-specification which is accessible from the hard to miss drop down menu at the top.

      I have no opinion on whether this is blogspam, but the UX on that page is terrible (on mobile at least). I need to click to expand every section (9 times). And to make it worse, expanding one section collapses the others.