• Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course it was about slavery. Aka money. They were intrinsically linked, and outlawing slavery would have trashed their largely cash crop economy while the North’s industrialization kept right on chugging away. The racism was more complicated but primarily served to keep the poor - free - white citizenry from realizing that the rich elite were the real enemy. Just like today, really.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is doubly asinine on their part when we remember that was the time industrial agriculture machines were invented, like the cotton gin, that made slavery largely unnecessary.

      They just wanted to have victims to feel superior to.

      • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s actually even worse than that, they would have made more money by industrialization if they adopted it. They are just always slow to adopt shit.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I was in school, “hyuck hyuck, lookuhtem queers in ‘em pipe paynts. Geigh as hay-uhl! Hyuck hyuck.”

          The next year, pipe pants with big belt buckles were in fashion. Jnco cowboys. Not practical for goat roping at all.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re making $30/hr now, and you could join a trade union and make $65/hr as a journeyman, you’d do it, no question. But if you first have to take a 5 year apprenticeship where you’re only making $15/hr, that’s a hard sell. Eventually it will work out, but you’re making good enough money now and you don’t want to go through 5 years of hardship.

          Retooling an entire economy isn’t easy.