• _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    Sure, if the instance the comms are on allows it, they have that right. Of course, looking at the member numbers, doesn’t look like any of them are taking you up on the offer for a safe place. I’ve heard the term echo chamber before, but you don’t even have enough people for that.

    • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Of course, looking at the member numbers, doesn’t look like any of them are taking you up on the offer for a safe place. I’ve heard the term echo chamber before, but you don’t even have enough people for that.

      So then it’s a win for you, right? I mean, I do my own thing and no one shows up. So cool

      So instead of trying to get me banned, shouldn’t you just be laughing that no one cares about me? No reason to start entire threads about me, since no one cares, right?

      No reason to be scared of little ole me. The guy no one shows up for.

      And if there is a place for conservatives, and no one shows up, then win-win for you. Because Lemmy’s can say “Hey we don’t discriminate, there are places for conservatives!” And since no one goes there, then you don’t have to worry about it.

      So no reason to be upset with me, right?

      I just talking into the void to an audience of one. Right?

      Shouldn’t the tone of this thread be, “hahaha Universal Monk is nothing! Look, no one is listening to him! How pathetic!” instead of "He’s dangerous, we gotta get rid of him. He’s ruining Lemmy!"

      Right?

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’m not trying to get you banned. I don’t give a shit about you, other than finding a momentary bit of amusement at how sad and lonely the whole thing looks.

        • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, he said that to me too. I don’t care about him being banned, although making a bunch of aliases is bullshit. ESPECIALLY if they are names that already belong to people. Double bullshit there.

          Lemmy is unintentionally Lemmy. It just is itself. Creating a “Conservative Land” like some Disney park, intentionally, and trying to “if I build it they will come” it into existence?

          That’s just odd behavior. Anyone can do it if they like. And if they aren’t offensive I daresay they won’t be defederated. But the aliases bother me, and I think defederation may come because of that. Certainly using SatansMaggotyCumFart (man, I hate that that’s now going to be a spelling suggestion).

        • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          And I appreciate you saying that. Read the whole thread. You’ll find yourself in the minority when it comes to your banning opinion.

          Now as for sad and lonely, then again, I’d argue that there is nothing to fear by having me be here.

          Also for context, I’m retired early, I’m fit and healthy with a gf and a social life that is more active than I would prefer. There is nothing sad or lonely about my life.

          I like the idea of Lemmy. I like posting on Lemmy. And I think all points of view (as long as legal) should be allowed.

          I don’t take any of this shit seriously though. lmao I even have a selfie on my slrpnk instance of my name in a workout community I started.

          The other people in this thread need to take shit less seriously though. lol