Disclaimer: OP doesn’t support CCP or authoritarian communism.

TLDR Despite significant advancements and price drops in renewable energy sources, the lack of profitability compared to fossil fuels hinders investment and expansion. Factors like unbundled energy markets, volatility in pricing, and reliance on private investment further complicate the transition. The narrative calls for a reevaluation of energy production systems, advocating for state-led, publicly funded renewable projects to ensure a viable path toward sustainable energy solutions.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is proof that capitalism sucks. You’re getting readily available electricity, and yet oil is more profitable.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are currently. Google and Microsoft are working on getting private nuclear power plants up and running so they can sell more AI slop

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ok, lots to unpack in this video, but the primary issue is that it is highly US centric and doesn’t apply very well to other large electricity markets like the EU.

    Here in the EU there is already a very high percentage of renewable electricity generation, often exceeding 70% of the total.

    But we have hit a wall not because of too much competition or low profitability, but the exact opposite.

    In the EU the power generation is primarily owned by a few large companies, basically an oligopol. These own both large renewable and fossile fuel plants.

    The video is correct in how it describes how electricity spot markets function, but has a blind spot in how it can be gamed if a few large companies conspire in keeping the electricity a mix.

    By ensuring the demand is rarely fully covered with cheap renewables, but rather keeping a few expensive to run gas-fired plants in the mix, they can collect the price for the gas powered electricity even for the cheap renewables and thus make record profits as long as they keep the market captured like that.

    As a result electricity prices for private and industrial consumers are high, despite a large percentage of cheap renewables, and this is a huge barrier for the much larger non-electricity energy consumption sector to electrify.

    • ujeenator@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      but has a blind spot in how it can be gamed if a few large companies conspire in keeping the electricity a mix.

      Interesting, thank you for insights, is there anybody on youtube or podcasts who provide any analysis on this topic for EU?

      As a result electricity prices for private and industrial consumers are high

      Does that mean, that it may be cheaper for them in advance, to build their own solar plant + large energy storage? e.g. with 3-5 years ROI

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yanis Varoufakis has done a few interviews and videos on the topic which you can find on YouTube.

        Some industries are doing that, yes. But due to very low natural gas prices until 2022, much of the industry has slept on the issue and now with general economic headwinds are not necessarily prioritizing such investments due to other bigger problems.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    The problem is that renewables can be done by a lot smaller companies then fossil fuels. Solar can be done by a family on the roof rather easily. Wind turbines cost 3million per piece, so very possible investment for a farmer, small company and the like.

    Fossil fuel power plants are a lot more expensive hence competition is smaller. We are easily talking 100million and more per plant. Large pipelines, refineries and oil or gas field developments easily cost over a billion. That keeps out competition. Not to mention oil having the largest cartel in the world backing it.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Compounding the problem is that the incentives for the company don’t always align with the incentives for the person making the decisions.

    If you work in an oil company, anything you do to invest in renewable energy will make you look like a traitor to your peers, and on a personal level, you’ll be at risk of trading the existing huge well-polished mature empire underneath you for a scrappy little tiny empire that might or might not succeed. That distorts decision-making away from sensible decisions even in areas like the tech sector where the scrappy little empire might have orders of magnitude more profit in it. In energy, where as pointed out, the profit might actually be lower, there’s not an energy company on the planet that will do much more than tell their marketing team to talk a lot about it so they look like they’re doing something that people like.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I get it but even with all these drawbacks we’re doing pretty good, I’d like to see China and India have their lines start going back the other way

    Also he didn’t mention much about batteries, which are fantastic for arbing cheap solar during the day and expensive power at night

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What to consider for China is, that it exports a shit ton of products into other countries. What this means is, that emissions that should be advocated to the EU or US are being emitted in China, which is part of the reason why it has such high emissions.

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s really cool that they’re producing so much stuff, but I don’t give a shit, I don’t care if they’re the #1 maker of carbonated dildos, and the US and EU have no market for building those things, it means nothing to me being #1 in renewables manufacturing and yet having co2 emissions go up, it means that even though they’re producing a lot of renewables they’re still sucking compared to the USA and EU and rest of the western world when it comes down to the cold hard facts, they’re not reducing their co2 output

        SINGAPORE, Feb 13 (Reuters) - China started construction on 94.5 gigawatts of coal-fired power in 2024, the highest volume of new builds since 2015, hampering the country’s transition away from fossil fuels, researchers said in a report published on Thursday.

        https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-2024-coal-power-construction-hits-10-year-high-researchers-say-2025-02-13/

        Compare that to the UK:

        UK’s last coal-fired power plant officially closes as ‘ambitious’ energy transition takes hold

        https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-30/last-coal-fired-power-plant-in-uk-officially-closes/104378430

        And Australia:

        The current coal capacity in the NEM is 23GW, and 1.6GW in the SWIS, totalling 25GW in Australia

        We’re shutting ours down not starting them up

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      China makes more renewables than the rest of the world.

      Look at completed and under construction. Wind, solar, nuclear, hydro, pumped hydro.

      50% car sales are EVs.

      10% of GDP is clean tec.

      A large part of emission growth is rapid increases of the petrochemical industry. That’s not going to last long.

      The energy demand increase is almost entirely being met by renewables and increasing. Its going to drop very fast.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean china and indias rise are mostly due to export though and really the carbon is on other countries. Would be good to see a chart of carbon produced by country consumption per capita.

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        consumption per capita

        Is silly imo, it’s quite clear that actual co2 output in the billions of tons is far more important to reduce than Fiji doing 10x the per capita rate than China but outputting a grand total of hardly nothing

  • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    checks countries that invest in green energy Huh they’re all capitalist. Strange, its as if this video is commie propaganda for idiots.

    • ujeenator@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Did you actually listen to the video? They explicitly mention that capitalist countries do subsidize renewable energy, but it’s unreliable due to political fluctuations. Subsidies can be abruptly discontinued with a change in administration (e.g. like new US administration cuts funding). The main point of the video is the investment behavior of energy companies regarding renewable energy, and why, from a Return on Investment perspective, renewables are still not competitive.

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No i didn’t, thanks for the summary. Seems like capitalism is going against the tankie propaganda and investing in things that are not profitable since capitalists are not evil.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          being anti-capitalist is not the same as being a tankie. conflating the 2 is how labels get diluted

          • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            American capitalism and capitalism are 2 different things. America is a 3rd world anti humane shithole, while europe is just fine.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              also absolutely true!

              i’d even say that anti-capitalist and anti-capitalism are different things too