I duno if you meant to but the transition effect reminded me of the civ2 advisors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzE2fpe0kCs

Kia and Hyundai really need better QA, this is the sort of thing you should never have happen

That is insane and makes me wonder if it’s stupid as well, are they not capable of monitoring the lines voltage and shutting down if required on demand instead of the entire summer?

That’s such a fuckup I can’t believe it

refresh and you should get the old pick the ones with traffic lights

funnily enough guy said they have it because otherwise wouldn’t be able to keep up with traffic

wasn’t that 4chan in general, it’s fun to post far right memes and jokes until the actual far right shows up and doesn’t know the difference

tbf you could, they’re apparently as tiny as those little jumping spiders

it is dragnet mass surveillance, something I detest as it makes everyone guilty by default

We have it here in Australia:

Law enforcement agencies are being provided with the web browsing histories of people under investigation using mandatory data retention powers, despite the federal government specifically excluding that practice in the legislation, the commonwealth ombudsman has warned.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/07/web-browsing-histories-are-being-given-to-australian-police-under-data-retention-powers

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1u6s6pm/stop_using_ollama/

I personally use LM Studio for local models and used openwebui when I wanted a different mistral api model

You’ll love what they tried next: Fencing them in (stupid long fences)

I duno when it goes from stupid to impressive

That’s a bloody long fence!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit-proof_fence#/media/File:Rabbit_proof_fence_in_Western_Australia.PNG

Surely Guinness Book of Records!

edit turns out it’s another fence in Australia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingo_Fence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_fence_in_the_world

Apparently we were mad about putting up fence posts back in the day

i mean ruling class // basic economics

lots of old people + more pensions + more healthcare costs + less young people working = young people pay more taxes + work harder for less = a bad thing

outside of some techno fantasy solution where robots care for the elderly (how dystopian in itself) having more old people than young people is never a good thing

finally something genuinely worth getting upset over, not fuggin playstation cd games

This is easier to say in a comment than in real life

these guys are so confidently wrong they make chatgpt3.5 turbo look humble

deleted by creator

When did he say this? Is this real?

edit: Damn you’re quick, 26 minutes ago

Donald Trump says he has pushed back on requests from Vladimir Putin to hold potential peace talks in Moscow.

“One of the things that I talked to [Putin] about was, where would you want to meet? And he said, ideally in Moscow,” Trump said, adding that he rejected the idea as it “just doesn’t work”.

“But he’ll meet and Zelenskyy is going to meet and something’s going to happen,” says Trump. “It’s going to be positive.”

The US president adds that he hopes a meeting with the two sides will happen “soon”.

He then turns to Zelenskyy and asks: “Would you go to Moscow?”

“It’s difficult, there’s a lot of Ukrainian drones there,” Zelenskyy jokes, to laughter from those in the room.

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-latest-negotiators-leave-for-geneva-as-kim-jong-un-honours-north-korean-martyrs-who-died-for-russia-12541713

Sounds like someone only has the minimum amount of flare 😬

Is this an American thing? You guys can’t just take an order you need a big smile and then flirt and compliment every single customer?

Sounds rough

what’s wrong about the picture?

Did you not see the gnostic and agnostic in front of atheist and theist?

eg. you are aware of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_atheism

yeah i think maybe you’ve reduced atheist down to such a simple premise that you don’t understand knowledge vs belief

anyway all good, have a nice day

It’s the only definition of atheist.

someone who does not believe in any god or gods, or who believes that no god or gods exist

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/atheist

I’ve never heard of atheism claiming definitively that there are no deities or higher powers either

Maybe this will help?

This definition is also found in multiple encyclopedias and dictionaries of philosophy. For example, in the Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, William L. Rowe (also an atheist) writes, “Atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. It proposes positive disbelief rather than mere suspension of belief” (2000: 62). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy recognizes multiple senses of the word “atheism”, but is clear about which is standard in philosophy:

[Atheism is] the view that there are no gods. A widely used sense denotes merely not believing in god and is consistent with agnosticism [in the psychological sense]. A stricter sense denotes a belief that there is no god; this use has become standard. (Pojman 2015, emphasis added)

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/

Maybe you will understand the picture I posted in the other comment as well now?