pseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agonuked from orbitmander.xyzimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1419cross-posted to: murderedbywords@feddit.ukscience_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up1419imagenuked from orbitmander.xyzpseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: murderedbywords@feddit.ukscience_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squarenotsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agohaha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agoIt’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
minus-squarethrowback3090@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoIt’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.
haha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
It’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
It’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
Sure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.