simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 天前Skyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comexternal-linkmessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up1627 cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.worksgames@lemmit.online
arrow-up1627external-linkSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comsimple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 天前message-square129fedilink cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.worksgames@lemmit.online
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·21 天前I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·21 天前Don’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-221 天前I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·21 天前And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 天前Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-221 天前Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·21 天前Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 天前Well, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·20 天前No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
Don’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
Well, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.