• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    this is stupid, there’s SO many indie games using procedural generation which is fucking generative AI. It’s in a shitload of them, from speulunky to Darkest Dungeon 2.

    • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To be fair to the people protesting this isn’t what they’re objecting to. They don’t like tools which were built on theft, which all the major LLMs were. That’s the core issue, along with the fear that artists will be devalued and replaced because of them.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There are many reasons that people dislike gen AI; you can’t be sure that it’s because they dislike how it’s built on theft. Here are three different unrelated reasons to dislike gen AI:

        • it puts people out of work;
        • it’s built on theft;
        • it produces “slop” in large quantities
    • parlaptie@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Procedural generation is generative, but it ain’t AI. It especially has nothing in common with the exploitative practices of genAI training.

      • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        “AI” is just very advanced procedural generation. There’s been games that used image diffusion in the past too, just in a far smaller and limited scale (such as a single creature, like the pokemon with the spinning eyes

        • Probius@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          To me, what makes the difference is whether or not it’s trained on other people’s shit. The distinction between AI and an algorithm is pretty arbitrary, but I wouldn’t consider, for example, procedural generation via the wave function collapse algorithm to have the same moral implications as selling something using what most people would call AI-generated content.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          By this logic, literally any code is genAI.

          Has a branch statement? It makes decisions. Displays something on the screen, even by stdout? Generated content.

        • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It doesn’t make decisions, but neither does Gen AI. Not sure if you’re doubly wrong or half right.

          But it’s not Gen AI.

        • parlaptie@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          As I touched on previously, those aren’t the qualities that make people opposed to AI. But have fun arguing dictionary definitions.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Ah but remember that AI no longer means the what it has meant since the dawn of computing, it now means “I don’t understand the algorithm, therefore it’s AI”.

      Hell, AI used to mean mundane things like A* pathfinding, which is in like, every game ever.

      I’m really tired of the shift in what AI means.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I remember we used to refer to enemy logic as AI. The 4 Pac-Man ghosts each had different “AI”. The AI of the enemies in this FPS sucks. This kind of stuff, lol