• Coffeegrinder@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s atleast better than picking up a product and leaving it somewhere else because you decided that you didnt need it anymore.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Have I mentioned how much I love my Canadian neighbors? Good job!

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Sounds good, but it depends on each individual market’s management whether they’ll have their lowly peons do the extra work of undoing that every time.

    • dumblederp@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The workers would still be paid for the re-facing of the product. Maybe the store would realise that USA made products aren’t worth stocking if there’s more wages required to fix up the shelf aesthetics. Workers are employed to work, if there isn’t work they’ll get sent home or have their shifts shortened. I don’t mind having to work at work, it’s what they’re paying me for.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You most likely didn’t mean it that way, but I’m seeing an alternate, unpleasant interpretation that can be misconstrued from your words.

        To use an example, it’s like those people who leave products they reconsider buying in random places due to being lazy, then say something like “I’m helping the workers stay employed by giving them work to do.” Which isn’t a very nice thing to do.

        I don’t think that at a personal level there are many people who would say “yay, more work” in this kind of situation…

        • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          The difference is the purpose. When people force stores to clean up after them for no reason, it can increase workloads and staffing requirements. It’s pennies on the dollar, but its still a violation of the social contract, especially when you factor in the employee’s personal involvement in cleaning up a mess that shouldn’t exist.

          When people force stores to clean up after them for a political purpose, the cost is part of the point. It costs time and therefore money to continuously re-face those products, and therefore encourages the store to reduce its stock and shelving of that product.

          Again, pennies on the dollar, so significant inventory changes would require extreme customer participation in the trend, but at the very least you may spread some awareness and find some solidarity in your daily routine. May even find like-minded employees and managers who “didn’t notice” or consistently “forget” to fix it.

        • brian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I think the framing needs to show that it isn’t going to be “more work”, it’s just different work. The people being tasked with this clean up would’ve been doing something else, not just standing around.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The only problem with that logic, at least from my experience working retail, is that no jobs would be added just to face the shelves faster. The existing workers would just be expected to spend less time on every other task during their shift to make up for it.

        It’s the same sort of logic as people who just like to leave carts anywhere they feel like in the parking lot. Someone gets paid to retrieve them after all, right?

  • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    And now Jeremy has to stay an hour after close to face the shelves because his asshole manager won’t let him leave until the shelves are in perfect order.

    I appreciate the sentiment, but this is just possibly ruining somebody’s night that just wanted to clock out and meet up with their friends.

    Maybe someone passionate about this movement could distribute rolls of tiny US flag stickers to consumers so they could mark offending products, though poor Jeremy would still possibly be tasked with scraping them off.

    I don’t know. Jeremy needs a better job but there aren’t any.

  • blinfabian@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    seems like a pretty bad idea, i think this is just gonna inconvenience the workers. officially “made in EU/USA” labels would be better imo

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Labels would be better but US producers aren’t going to label their products voluntarily are they.

      It’s a great way to communicate foreign products to other shoppers and remind people that buying local is still important after the news cycle moves on.

      It may be somewhat inconvenient for employees but that will financially inconvenience employers and encourage them to discontinue more foreign product lines.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I can’t speak for every worker, but I was a grocery clerk. Facing is a regular part of the job, and it’s for a good cause. It wouldn’t bother me

      • brewery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Exactly, especially jobs where you don’t have to directly interact with customers or management while doing it. I loved stock room work for the same reason

    • itsame@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Labels are not always sufficient. Labels for Country of Origin or Made in Europe (or China) can still mean that the profits go to USA, would for me also be a reason to look for alternatives.

    • mvlad88@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Write your regultors, ask them to make the country of orientation a mandatory labeling requirement. Make it big and obvious.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Many of my local stores are using red maple leafs and changing the barcode names to indicate Canadian made products.