• Umbrias@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No it didn’t. It was not a conventional peer review process, it was an aesthetic review of if it looked adequate, not if the content was, and only barely passed… at an ai conference workshop… by people who knew it was an ai produced paper. this is shameful work.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    First? I seem to recall a group getting garbage auto-gen through peer review without AI.