• ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    From a content creation standpoint, it does kind of suck. There’s no ego about it. The system doesn’t carry your content to nearly as many eyes, even accounting for the reduced audience. Discovery and suggestion algorithms are extremely effective, and if I’m trying to get my stuff to reach as much of my audience as possible, I wouldn’t only be on Mastodon. I’m not just talking about mediocre content either - even extremely motivating stuff in the niche doesn’t generate even a small fraction of engagement as regular social media sites.

    For some people, this is a benefit - it’s a poorly commodified system. For small content creators trying to build an audience and generate paid subscribers, it’s not enough. Most creators on Fediverse are contributing as a free or non-profit hobby.

    • synicalx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’d prefer for my social media to not be full of ads for “content”.

      • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not talking about ads. Let’s say I’m a video essayist and I publish my essays on PeerTube. The recommendation algorithms aren’t going to show the free content I make to nearly as many people as if I put them on YouTube or Tiktok. And overall, that translates to fewer Patreon subscribers, FAR fewer.

        • synicalx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s still an ad, you want money for a product you’re offering. The only difference is in your case there’s an extra step between impression and conversion.