• Kieselguhr [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah no-one is against a peace deal at this point

    Great, call a ceasefire now.

    Just against the one where you let they totalitarian agressor win. Anyone who knows anything about history knows you have to stop those kind of regimes at the earliest possible moment.

    So you are against a peace deal? You do know that the fabled ukrainian counteroffensive has failed completely? How many more regular ukrainians should die in hopeless counteroffensives?

    Btw it seems like you don’t know what totalitarian means. Actual academic historians tend to avoid this term since the seventies.

    • The Ukrainians are the ones who can decide if and when they want to surrender. They are gaining ground every day and have all the time they want to kill as many invaders as they want. Let’s see how many men, women and money Putin is prepared to waste before he eventually retreats, Afhganistan style

      • Kieselguhr [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sorry, are you the same person I’ve been talking to? Because it seems like you haven’t actually read anything I’ve written.

        The Ukrainians are the ones who can decide if and when they want to surrender.

        Western politicians actively sabotaged peace talks. Read previous comments for sources.

        They are gaining ground every day

        This has no basis in reality. Even overly optimistic western sources have admitted the failure of the spring counteroffensive.

        have all the time they want

        How can you be this wrong? They have limited manpower and more and more soldiers die every day. Every week spent warring is a huge burden on their economy.

        I’m not gonna answer you again since you are completely out of touch with reality. Even prowar western journalists are more careful with their wording.