tyler@programming.dev to Python@programming.dev · 1 year agoO(no) You Didn’tmrshiny608.github.ioexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up119 cross-posted to: programming@programming.devgolang@programming.devprogrammingcirclejerk@programming.dev
arrow-up119external-linkO(no) You Didn’tmrshiny608.github.iotyler@programming.dev to Python@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square3fedilink cross-posted to: programming@programming.devgolang@programming.devprogrammingcirclejerk@programming.dev
minus-squareFizzyOrange@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoTL;DR, big-O ignores the constant factor. If you already know what that means you don’t need to read this…
minus-squareduckythescientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoEh, I also enjoyed seeing the comparison between Go and Python, seeing the jumps in time because of allocations, and knowing the size of the list when the more efficient algorithm started to become faster.
TL;DR, big-O ignores the constant factor. If you already know what that means you don’t need to read this…
Eh, I also enjoyed seeing the comparison between Go and Python, seeing the jumps in time because of allocations, and knowing the size of the list when the more efficient algorithm started to become faster.