The government is suggesting that it might ban some Apple security updates. Under the latest plans, tech companies would need to notify the British government before rolling out a security fix but might be refused permission if it blocks a vulnerability that’s being exploited by security services.

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      In this case I don’t think it would matter. Labour are pretty authorial in some areas too

        • theinspectorst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Totally. We’ve had a few decades now of successive governments that have taken increasingly centralising attitudes towards privacy and civil liberties - essentially going back to the 1980s.

          But the one bright spot in there was the 2010-15 Coalition, who abolished Labour’s biometric ID scheme (people forget now, but the Brown government had passed legislation that meant that, if they’d won the 2010 election, then we would all have needed to register for these), deleted innocent people’s DNA records from the police DNA database, halved the maximum length of time the police could detain people without charging them with any crime (from 28 to 14 days - after Labour has earlier tried to increase it to 90), etc. The Coalition was the one truly liberalising government of my lifetime and that’s entirely a consequence of the Lib Dems’ role in driving its agenda.

        • Z3k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree I vote snp myself.

          Just to expand a wee bit

          Lib dem who sold out their vote voters for the illusion of power.

          The greens don’t stand here (the Scottish greens are a separate party from the one in eng/wales) the etc tend not to stand here with the possible exception of ukip and fringe people that are some how more insane

            • Z3k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You ate absolutely correct in that regard.

              They get my vote for a couple reasons.

              They are the least bad option outside of what I used to do and vote for an independent.

              Some of their policies that have been implemented have directly benefited me and mine. Annoyingly with policies that Labour should be pushing.

              They are never going to be in government at the UK level with labour’s policy of rather having a tory government than work with them.

              They are a means to an end without being as bigoted as the lot that split off with Alex for the most part.

              I find yousef very bland but I would say if the other nutter got the job I’d ho back to independents

        • Z3k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          No shit it’s almost like I said that in another coment probably over an hour ago responding to someone else making the same comment.

          But the reality of the situation is qe at best have a 2.5 party system with lib dem ensuring the tories get in when Labour can’t quite get an outright majority.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Unfortunately I have no doubt that Labour would also implement something like this too, they didn’t have a good track record for civil liberties when they were in power.