I never said renewable would magically replace fossil in a year. Just saying there’s a huge emphasis on “production is down X%!” Whereas the renewables % is effectively replacing that loss.
The rest of the article is so much speculation. Companies reducing the amount they have in storage is somehow predictive of a collapse? Fewer rigs? Yea, not like there’s a ton of economic uncertainty or anything.
Listen, there are many reasons a global collapse can happen. This one is just so much damn speculation it hurts.
I’m afraid there is no energy transition https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy
The amount of fossil in primary energy use remains at about 80% and changes so slowly, it doesn’t matter.
Great website.
“No energy transition?”
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/electricity-fossil-renewables-nuclear-line?time=2004..latest
Did you notice the “primary energy” part?
I never said renewable would magically replace fossil in a year. Just saying there’s a huge emphasis on “production is down X%!” Whereas the renewables % is effectively replacing that loss.
The rest of the article is so much speculation. Companies reducing the amount they have in storage is somehow predictive of a collapse? Fewer rigs? Yea, not like there’s a ton of economic uncertainty or anything.
Listen, there are many reasons a global collapse can happen. This one is just so much damn speculation it hurts.