OnlyFans billboards ruled 'not overtly sexual' by UK ad watchdog
www.euronews.com
Eliza Rose Watson's OnlyFans billboards have been cleared. "If a gambling or alcohol company can run their ads, which have far more devastating impacts, why not me?"
  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    35·
    1 year ago

    It’s completely tame. There are far more sexual images in just about any direction. It’s only because people know there’s actual nakedness being advertised that anyone has a problem with it. And that’s just silly.

    • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
      10·
      1 year ago

      People are just mad that women have a new and effective way to monetize their inherent value (edit as a human, in a way that men can’t compete as well with). they are mad because they either have moral objections, or want to deny said intrinsic value. Its a sad effect of people not loving themselves. Its also hilariously transparent when people get mad about things like this.

        • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
          5·
          1 year ago

          to be clear i mean inherent value as a human. Men’s inherent value isn’t questioned, so i didn’t mention it. I can see how you would think that how i meant it, and I’ll see about editing the comment so it doesn’t read that way.

          • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
            11·
            1 year ago

            She’s advertising her ability to titillate, not her personality or intrinsic value and self-worth. Even with your edit, you’re still equating the persona she adopts for her business with her value as a person.

            • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
              3·
              1 year ago

              The ability to titillate IS an intrinsic value, a human one at that. You’re probably just sour that you don’t feel you have that ability, so you want to deny the existence and power of the ability to titilate on a human value basis.

              • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
                7·
                1 year ago

                Projecting much?

                I don’t have any personal desire to do any sex work. But women who are less conventionally attractive or who don’t feel confident on camera are not any less valuable than those who do. You’re equating a woman’s value as a human to her sex appeal and that’s disgusting.

                • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
                  1·
                  1 year ago

                  You don’t need to do sex work to be a human and appreciate the human experience of being titilated or titillating someone else. It’s a wonderful part of the human experience.

                  You keep insisting that you know what I’m talking about, for whatever fucking reason, and you’re consistently wrong. Why are you like this?

                  Stop putting your words in my mouth, they taste like shit

              • Arrakis@lemmy.worldEnglish
                4·
                1 year ago

                Wow, you really went directly from “possibly just a poorly written comment” to “actually is just an absolute cunt”, didn’t you?