• kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m sure you don’t need to be told, but for those who are reading and need to hear it: the most powerful and healthy thing a GM can do is say no. The GM gets to arbitrate the tone of the game and setting, and healthy boundaries are conducive to both fun and creativity.

    • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      5 days ago

      Actually OP handled it pretty well, at least in the end . PC face consequences for their actions (a trial with the risk of being hung) and end up having to act to solve the problem. It’s somehow created more game opportunities.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It’s a world of gods that intervene with mortals, so a GM is perfectly justified in-universe in smiting any players who get out of hand.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          5 days ago

          But, sometimes it’s more fun to let the players go. Especially if they keep the game and the table separated.

          Cross lines in game, but keep the table clean? Then keep going.

          Cross lines at the table, and the game ends until everyone has talked it through. And sometimes the game is just over.

          This story sounds like it stayed in game enough, but may have been scratching at the table. Enough to pull back and talk for a moment, but not enough to kill the game.