• Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I assume the title has been edited since your comment, but I’m sitting here giggling about:

      Sweden (Sweden) reveals…

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I believe it is called “clickbait.” As in “Click here to find out what terrible thing just happened to which NATO ally!”

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Somehow “ally” in this context makes it sound like Sweden is not part of NATO.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Here are a few potential theories:

    • Conspiracy nut
    • Criminal gang acting on behalf of a foreign government
    • Domestic terrorist, recruited by foreign government
    • Foreign agent

    At this point I am leaning towards it being a conspiracy nut

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      russia has been found to pay delinquents and gangs to sabotage stuff in their countries. A conspiracy nut would probably be even cheaper, you just have to wind them up enough.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Simply because there are more conspiracy nuts than people and governments wanting to destroy infrastructure

  • regdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Newsweek is a terrible publication because all of their articles are extremely left leaning:

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not sure if you are joking or not, but I’m pretty sure that only shows a default starting position of the “gauge”, and not the rating it has received so far. It’s bad design because it looks like everything is left-leaning, but I guess they wanted to uae a gauge in the neutral position as an illustration. I might be wrong though…

      • regdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is objectively bad design that the arrow is leaning far left by default. It makes you wonder what else they messed up.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The thing is for you to rate your opinion on how you think the author did when writing the article it is not to tell the reader how biased the article is.

        • withabeard@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The thing that says “click to rate” and has the pointer arm off the chart in it’s default “rest” position.

          Right, it’s right there

          • regdog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Thanks for breaking down how poorly this bias indicator is implemented. That is the point that I wanted to make.