0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 days agorace conditionslemmy.zipimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1868
arrow-up1868imagerace conditionslemmy.zip0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 days agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoFun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
minus-squarenialv7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoI did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days ago I did say “general purpose”. I did say “fun fact”.
Fun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
I did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
I did say “fun fact”.