• Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is for restricting use, not proving authenticity of the videos recording. Anyone can spin up keys and sign videos, so in a legal battle it would be worthless.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The technology would be extremely easy to adapt, with the certs being tied to the original recording equipment hardware. Given i don’t see a $60 ip cam having a dolphin board it would probably be relegated to much higer end equipment, but any modification with a new key would break the chain of veracity

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This is blatantly not true, it would be extremely simple to circumvent. How do you “tie” the cert to a specific hardware without trusting manufacturers? You just can’t, it’s like putting a padlock on a pizzabox.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I literally explained earlier how this exact technology is used in digital cinema dude c’mon.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            That doesn’t mean it’s useful for forensics, IMO.

            Edit: not saying it wont be though, just that it’s not as bullet proof as you’d think, IMO.