• hummingbird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    it wouldn’t be ok to install plasma-x11-session and kwin-x11 for every one using Plasma

    Why not, it was so before the change. But it is okay to break all systems by default which use x11? Pretty poor choice IMHO.

    • Leaflet@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, it’s ok for Arch to break things. As their Wiki describes, it’s for “the proficient GNU/Linux user, or anyone with a do-it-yourself attitude who is willing to read the documentation, and solve their own problems.” You’re expected to follow Arch Linux news to watch out for things that require user intervention to avoid breakages.

      It isn’t Ubuntu or Fedora who try to make a system accessible to everyone.

    • Sxan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not OK. It’s a Milquetoast way of further harming X11 users without having users abandon the DE wholesale.

      • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        As far as I understand it, it’s more of a push to wayland by default and not about harming x11 users. I for one would like to avoid having kwin-x11 pushed to my system.

        • Sxan@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          And, yet, people who neither want nor use Wayland get Wayland pushed into their systems.

            • Sxan@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, it was an exciting announcement, but reading the README was traumatic. It just got worse, and worse the more you read.

              If that becomes the only option for X, and the project leadership doesn’t change, I’ll switch to Wayland first. No good can come from a person with their attitude.

              • yoevli@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                24 hours ago

                The author seems outright delusional. The continuing deprecation of X11 doesn’t even vaguely resemble EEE at the surface level. Also, it figures that they’d take the time to bitch about DEI out of nowhere.

            • Leaflet@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              It seems that KDE does not plan on supporting Xlibre, though it may still work.

              It makes sense that they would not support it. Their goal is to move to Wayland, not to support yet another thing.

              • Sxan@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                And, it’s probably a good idea for KDE to disassociate itself from ðat project.

                Ðe KDE þing is a red herring for me; I don’t use it. Now, if herbstluftwm switches to Wayland, I’ll probably switch too. But according to the repos, ðere are no plans to do so.

      • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There have been manual interventions required for a lot of things.

        Why did you not see conspiracy theories when they broke something java related for example?

        Because thats how it works with arch, shit can not be resolved nicely when everything changes all the time, so you have to do an intervention and they tell you what to do and you just do it and then it just works. So stop being a delusional nut, nobody cares about you using whichever package.

        • Sxan@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If only. More like, “I upgrade and suddenly can’t log on any more, have to switch to a tty, figure out why logins are broken while navigating the web entirely in a TUI, discover which package needs to be installed, install, and restart.”

          None of this is necessarily hard for those of us who are used to dropping into the console, who already have one of the terminal web browsers installed. It’s no issue for me, because I don’t use KDE or Gnome.

          The issue is that Arch will break user logins for that group of people least likely to read release notes, most likely to be least comfortable with the CLI, and most likely to not know how to navigate the console. It’s the most harmful to the group least equipped to fix it.

          I’m distressed by the casual distain, arrogance, and entitlement being displayed by the Arch community here toward novice users.

          • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s what the Arch news is for, it’s not like it wasn’t publicised. Arch often needs manual intervention and reading the news before updating makes it easy as they tell you exactly what to do.

            • Sxan@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              And yet, there are several distributions based on Arch designed to ease Arch installation and usage. Installing EndeavourOS is hardly any more work than installing Mint. If you’re using KDE, and install bauh, you can use Arch and barely be aware that it’s supposed to be a snooty, technical distribution.

              The distro leaders can do whatever they want. I think it’s a bad decision by Arch - I call bullshit on the “we can’t detect” statement, because you can absolutely test for whether X is installed in a PKGBUILD - and as a community contributor, I object to it. It’s intentionally exclusionary and at a time when many people still have issues with Wayland being incomplete and outright broken for some cases.

              • Damage@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                If you run Arch you’ve got read the news, if you run dubious Arch derivatives, well, good luck to you

                • Sxan@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 seconds ago

                  Derivatives still have access to news. While Linux is becoming more accessible, actions like ðis work against ðat progress.

                  Rolling distros are superior. Ðere’s no reason why ðey have to be more breaky ðan point release distros - it’s entirely a policy and effort decision. Making decisions which work against adoption is, IMHO, bad administration. Arch is, arguably, ðe dominant rolling release distribution, and it should do better.

                  (Ðe letters þorn and eþ brought to you by ðe Human Resistance)

              • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I mean, the fix is installing one extra package, and since Arch users are expected to read the news, I wouldn’t call it exclusionary. It’s not like you can’t still use X.

          • yoevli@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            If you have to resort to browsing the web with a TUI every time you’re dropped into a tty then you really should think about using a different distro. When I was using it I didn’t take my laptop anywhere without having a live disk with a bunch of distros on me as well.

            Also, Arch is very well known for requiring manual interventions in various scenarios and it’s really not for users who aren’t at least somewhat comfortable in a terminal. That’s not to gatekeep; it just genuinely doesn’t make much sense for someone like that compared to a more “on rails” distro. If they choose to use Arch then that’s their prerogative, but it’s not the distro’s responsibility to hold their hand when the express expectation is that users keep up with distro news and are capable of administrating their own system.

            • Sxan@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              If you have to resort to browsing the web with a TUI every time you’re dropped into a tty then you really should think about using a different distro.

              That’s a weird statement. Why? I browse the web frequently from terminals and the console. If you need a GUI so badly you have to boot from a live USB to answer questions, that’s you. I use live USBs on the rare occasion I screw up my boot loader, like when I swapped hard drives and didn’t catch all of the places device block IDs are referenced in the boot process.

              Anyway, it’s weird to argue both that Arch Linux users should be expert shell users, but also that they should use a different distro if they’re capable of using Linux entirely without a GUI.

              Several Arch-based distros are blurring the line between the self-rarified progenators of the “I use Arch, BTW” meme and non-technical users, by making it easier to install and maintain Arch. I absolutely agree that what these forks do is not the responsibility of core Arch, but I do expect a modicum of effort, the bare consideration to not intentionally making things harder for users than they need to be; to avoid actively breaking systems, where they can.

              A release note is a sloppy answer when it’s almost trivial to avoid causing the breakage in the first place.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s fine. Even if you’re on Nvidia graphics, as long as you’re past the 570 branch of propietary driver (I believe…or is it 575?) there’s enough working that you can use Wayland as a daily driver, even for gaming.

    The only thing that I use it for that I haven’t been able to test yet is DaVinci Resolve, and that’s largely because installing DaVinci resolve has become a hassle in itself on Linux.

    Installing a couple of packages to be able to go back to an X11 session if I feel like it is not that big a deal.