• Thassodar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    I took pickes and tomatoes off my burger, where’s my $0.23 discount damn it?!

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Let’s assume cutting out tomatoes and pickles saved $0.23 per hamburger.

      McDonald’s serves 6.5 million hamburgers a day.
      That’s $500 million extra yearly profit for their shareholders.

      • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s actually a decent analogy there I think. The hamburger won’t cost less, because the service of customization it itself less efficient: serving customers with their preference of with/without is more expensive than just pickles for all. Likewise I imagine making a game that looks OK with/out RT is extra work than just with.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There really isn’t.

          The op comment was that gamers need to buy expensive hardware so that developers could cut on features/optimization.

          The follow-up reply likened it to customizing your burger, but the better analogy (and the one I assumed) would be for McDonald’s to remove all tomato and pickles (saving money), and the user had to buy it themselves to add to the burger.

        • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          There is no analogy. It’s comparing returning costs per product (you need a new tomato per 5 burgers) to a one time costs that can be cut during development. And additional copies of a game don’t generate more costs.