You must log in or # to comment.
Lies. They’re called lies, New York Times.
The problem with calling it a lie is it indicates an intent to deceive. Regardless of how true that is, it probably opens them up to lawsuits (or they’d be afraid of that happening). They could probably get away with calling them falsehoods but I’m not sure what the difference would really be between that and the way they already wrote things.
Isn’t “bullshit” his entire basis for doing anything?