• BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    The big turning point for me was when the guest celebrities were no longer characters on the show and just played themselves. Just small ads for celebrity du jour.

    Celebrities are the worst part of any media.

    • Destide@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      Every time a celebrity isn’t on-screen, everyone should be saying where’s celebrity?

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think I recall the Alex Baldwin and Kim Basinger being the first episode that pushed me off the Simpsons … it felt like celebrity pandering or something and I just stopped watching

      • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Absolutely. I was watching the series sequentially for the first time in ages and that episode stood out as a definite turning point. The celebrity appearances just got more frequent and more insufferable from then on.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      ? There were many Simpson celebrities in the 90’s that played themselves. Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Wade Boggs, Bob Hope, Leonard Nemoy…

          • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not every time. Those mentioned were mostly the exceptions. Tons of people were on the show not as themselves. Daniel Radcliffe wasn’t himself or Harry Potter on the show. He played a character that was a parody of Twilight. It had a somewhat decent enough joke and wasn’t just hey look at this famous person we got. Look how cool they are. Ooohhhhh ahhhhhhh

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              It does depend on how they are written into the show. Leonard Nimoy in the Monorsil episode is a caricature of himself and it works well.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        And those were the exceptions and not an every episode occurrence. Some of those also had good points to make like Lisa going vegan. Very much not how the modern cameos go.

        Somewhere around the point of Lady Gaga driving into Springfield on a magical train it became celebrity ads.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s quite jarring how everything pre-season 7 is compared to the rest. Like most the characters are quite deep with conflicting emotions and not caricatures. Especially season 2. Like “Bart gets an F” episode, that kind of empathetic emotional portrayal of bart would never happen post season 10.

    And we really went from Homer is a dumb guy who genuinely loves his family and is suffering under an oppressive system, to well “jackass homer”.

    • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      This process is called Flanderization, whereby a character on a long running show becomes a self-parody as their most distinctive traits and behaviors are amplified again and again. It’s named for a popular side character Ned Flanders, from the show the Simpsons. Though arguably Ned undergoes more permanent personal growth than any other character on the show.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Shortening attention spans had to be part of it. It was probably hard to compete with other shows that had rapid-fire jokes and shorter time to pay off. Building up complex characters and creative situations takes a little more time and probably loses eyeballs.

      Sort of analogous to long form vs short form videos now (but obviously both are much further down that road in comparison).

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I sometimes wonder if Family Guy had anything to do with it.

        Because Homer went from being quite his own character to basically Peter Griffin lite in the 2000s.

        • PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Wouldn’t surprise me a bit, that show was crazy influential, at least initially. Punchlines came way faster than we were used to, sometimes deliberately abruptly (iconic example of that for me is Peter’s instantaneous face-plants, which I still find funny TBH). And people liked the endless gags that were just random non sequiturs of dumb stuff happening that had nothing to do with anything. Fun at first, not enough to scaffold a whole show around IMO, but most folks couldn’t get enough.

          That kinda stuff really cheapened humor (“mainstream humor”? is that even a thing?) over the long run, according to me. I started to say I’m just crotchety and old, but actually I wasn’t then and I thought it was lame pretty quickly after the initial “fun new show everyone’s into” vibe wore off.

          Then again if it wasn’t them it would’ve just been another, audiences were just kinda “ready” for that sort of humor I suppose, obviously wouldn’t have been the runaway success it was otherwise. I’d be shocked if The Simpsons weren’t influenced, seems almost impossible with the cultural swell around Family Guy at the time.

      • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Also they had to reduce the episode runtimes to make room for more ads. I recall an interview where one of the writers said this made it really hard to have a b-story to accompany the main plot.

      • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        i rip them so they have the subs, extras, audio tracks, chapters, and commentary tracks plus i like to keep everything organised in my media folder (also if they ever came up with a vhsrip or a 90stvrip torrent format, i’d be in heaven)

        • Flamekebab@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’d forgotten about the commentary tracks! It’s weird how they’re not widely available for stuff.

          • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            i miss simpsons world so much. it was the best thing fx did </3 i wish it came back. i loved the themed “live streams” they used to have.

            but yeah the commentary tracks are amazing!

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Its never more apparent than when an IP changes hands or gets rebooted. Sometimes they have lightning in a bottle with the original and then the sequel/reboot just feels like a pale imitation wearing your beloved IP’s skin.

  • BlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pretty sure the pot episode came out while I was in high school and smoking pot, which woulda been 2000 at least. Which, well still proves the point.

    Still one of the best episodes ever. They call em fingers but I dont ever see them fing. O wait, there they go.