• flamboyantkoala@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nonsense. Belief in a god is a binary proposition.

    Life isn’t black and white. Neither is religion, at least not a religion I’d follow. Those who make it black and white are we have hatred and division.

    • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Life isn’t black and white.

      Nobody said anything about “life”. Nice strawman you have there.

      Neither is religion, at least not a religion I’d follow.

      The more important question is why any rational being would want to follow a religion, but I digress.

      I’m answering specifically to this assertion you made:

      I was defined atheist at one point in my life. Now I’m somewhere in the middle.

      The assertion “I believe in God” is true or false. It cannot be anything else.

      • flamboyantkoala@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The assertion “I believe in God” is true or false. It cannot be anything else.

        Right but what is God? There’s a myriad of different answers to that and most religions a God is not a being as much an idea or force.

        This is where it not being black and white comes into play. Answering that question with True of False means you believe my god is what you believe God to be. That’s likely not the case.

        • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Choose one god. Tell me if you believe in it or not. The answer is binary.

          And your answer is a cop-out. God with a capital G, the god called God, is understood to be the Judeochristian deity. But whatever, you’re obviously not discussing in good faith so let’s end it here.

          • flamboyantkoala@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not a cop out it’s just not black and white. You seem to really be struggling with the fact someone could be in a state between believing in God and not.

            You’d be surprised how many Christians will tell you they struggle with believing from time to time. The ones who will admit it at least. Many do and to many God is different from one to the next.

            • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not a struggle on my part; the whole idea is stupid.

              If I ask you if you believe that dogs are real, the only options are yes or no. You cannot be unaware of the state of your own belief.

              • flamboyantkoala@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                A dog is a real tangible thing. Easy to say yes. You’d have to be delusional not to believe it.

                God isn’t a person or thing, you can’t touch it, and the evidence is old written and many translated texts. However there is an obvious gap in our understanding of how and why we are here. So is God involved, was there a guiding hand can totally be a question that hasn’t fully resolved itself in my mind.

                • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  the evidence is old written and many translated texts

                  That is not evidence. They’re stories in a book that have not been corroborated by anything real later.

                  When you talk about evidence you need to refer to objetive, material, reproducible evidence that can be examined by skeptics, and that is valid both for the scientific method and before the law.

                  If your notion is unverifiable by definition, is not worth considering.

                  So is God involved, was there a guiding hand can totally be a question that hasn’t fully resolved itself in my mind.

                  You don’t have any legitimate reason to ask the question in the first place. The whole idea makes no sense.