• Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    The second stage is perversion of reality, where people come to believe that the sign is an unfaithful copy, which “masks and denatures” reality as an “evil appearance—it is of the order of maleficence”. Here, signs and images do not faithfully reveal reality to us, but can hint at the existence of an obscure reality which the sign itself is incapable of encapsulating.

  • this is the kind of thing that most of my family would be dismissive of my critiques, because it “looks nice” from their vantage point of a suburban parking lot. I come from a deeply incurious tribe.

    increasingly, my sense of intimacy and connection with people is mediated by our capacity for acknowledging and rejecting the absurdity of the world being presented to us as normal and desirable.

    some are happy when Mickey Mouse hands them a candy bar and resent me for party pooping all over the magic spell by perceiving the guy making shit wage in a hot, heavy costume handing out diabetes and heart disease because a machine of assholes have an agenda.

    • decaptcha [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      increasingly, my sense of intimacy and connection with people is mediated by our capacity for acknowledging and rejecting the absurdity of the world being presented to us as normal and desirable.

      Same, thanks for this comment, what a nice little seed crystal it was to precipitate out the supersaturated angst from my mind. I’ve felt this way for a while… maybe forever, but never really was able to pin it down.

      People say they cherish authenticity, well, here’s what that looks like y’all

  • Thoath@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    points at the tenses honey, you just gave a picture example, this isn’t a ‘They will’ anymore…they are

    • RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I thought it was an accepted form to describe ongoing things that will continue, like the phrase “murica will bomb your country and 20 years later will make a movie about how bombing civilians made their soldiers sad”, it’s not something that just will happen but something that happened, happens and will continue to happen.

      • Thoath@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        You can accept whatever you want, wording it this way specifically enables disassociation of the present, no matter what is ‘accepted’

        • Thoath@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          It’s a tactic, and shows/culminates a disconnect of real world events happening right now as a hypothetical

      • Thoath@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        ‘murica will bomb your country’ is specifically vague on purpose to push propaganda points and thought bubbles rather than calling America out for specifically doing these things in countries already and holding them accountable, this alights the idea in your head that you could be next, which is a propaganda tactic

        • Thoath@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          Not saying you couldn’t be next, but rather the invitation of this kinda mindset creates a ‘new victim’ mentality, instead of ‘Heel this influence and work against it’ in a revolution way, it’s a ‘Youll be next and you can’t stop it’

            • Thoath@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              30 days ago

              Are you sure that you’re not aware of giving political pundents on social media ‘the benefit of the doubt’ when it’s very obviously the status quo of political commentary?

              • Thoath@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                30 days ago

                Just so you’re aware, I’m not calling the post wrong, I’m calling into light the usage of verbage in psychological dissemination as an anchor for disassociation and trauma reactions of ‘Im gonna be next’ instead of ‘we should fix this issue that happening right now’ with MANY pundents on media, this is psychology, this is how word choice works

              • Thoath@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                30 days ago

                And before you say ‘Oh this isn’t political’ yes honey, rampant capitalism treatment of spaces to promote ‘optics’ in lue of hiding how they’re destroying community spaces, is political, it’s about controlling the narrative of how you perceive the community around you