Hey all. I’d like to open an official discussion regarding the upturning of the prior Hexbear party line on an :israel-cool: emote proper with the unambiguous Zionist flag.

I want to preface this by saying this is not in a ‘ceding the issue’ way. Over the past year I’ve been trying to engage in self-crit w/rt the chauvinism I’ve internalized growing up in a Liberal Zionist household, and my personal viewpoint on it did a 180 some months back, so I want to reopen this discussion proper in my personal capacities as Self-Appointed Emote Czar.

The reason it’s taken long enough beyond that is prior to July, I was essentially half-engaged with the site in order to finish out my degree. After that, it’s been mostly inertia of confirming with the admins and other /c/Judaism mods, as well as having to be rigorous about my job search personally giving me little free time to coordinate this.

I do not want to center myself in this conversation more than I inadvertently already have, so I will leave my own opinion on the issue as a comment rather than explaining further here.

The consensus we’ve roughly come to is to open up the discussion in an official manner for a day or so. After that, I’ll weigh the discussion in an entirely vibes-based manner (sorry Dean Norris enjoyers) and we’ll alter Hexbear party line on it accordingly.

lea-bounce

  • hellinkilla [they/them, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    17·
    1 year ago

    fuck me, why are we having this new thread? the arguments are thoroughly explained in that one. At least, the pro-emoji arguments. The small anti-emoji contingent appear to be spinning and resorting to various extremely ineffective bad faith strategies instead of putting anything coherent forward. I remain surprised about this position having been site policy for so long and there doesn’t seem to be a single person who can intelligently and sincerely state the case.

    (I’m about 2/3 down the page, maybe there will be surprise logic closer to the end…)

    • teledildonics [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      from what I’ve gathered the historical ““line”” was that burning a star of david feels icky (i get it, but ultimately ceding ground to the cynical utilitarianism of the nakba settlers), followed by “well it gives ammunition to external bad actors”, but also simultaneously “this is a small and insignificant site so why do you care about it go touch grass”.

      • hellinkilla [they/them, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
        17·
        1 year ago

        “this is a small and insignificant site so why do you care about it go touch grass”

        My hopes for logic to emerge at the end of the thread you posted were dashed. The small anti-israel-flag-burning crew resorted to tirades that other users oughtta “touch grass”. When faced with multiple people taking the time to make serious posts addressing each of their vague/lazy claims, they countered with “well this argument is so stupid!! and you are stupid for even having it!!!”

        Not impressed.